It seems more evident than ever that the Chinese economy is at a  critical crossroads, with inflation soaring to the highest level in  three years while other economic indicators point to a slowdown in  growth.
The latest economic data has created a dilemma for policymakers. They  have to maintain sustained growth while taming feverish domestic  prices. Inflation, fueled by surging food prices, hit 6.4 percent in  June and could run out of control if the central bank loosens its  monetary-tightening stance. However, the risk of an economic "hard  landing" leaves Beijing with limited room for further policy  maneuvering.
Government measures to contain inflation are beginning to have an  impact on the country's economy. Manufacturing activity, gauged by the  Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI), fell to 50.9 in June, its lowest level  for more than two years. The same month saw import growth also decline  unexpectedly to 19.3 percent year-on-year from 28.4 percent in May. Both  of these data snapshots signal a weakened domestic economy.
A series of increases in the required reserve ratio for banks to a  record 21.5 percent, added to repeated interest rate hikes, have also  put many of the country's private enterprises on the verge of  bankruptcy.
What is even more troubling is the country's massive amount of local  government debt and the rising level of non-performing loans in the  banking system.
Previous reports by some foreign media outlets said local governments  have borrowed as much as 14 trillion yuan ($2.16 trillion).
China's central bank denied that figure in a statement on its website  on Monday night. The People's Bank of China said that analysts were  incorrect in deriving that 14 trillion yuan figure from recent central  bank remarks that less than 30 percent of outstanding loans in the  country went to local governments at the end of 2010. The ratio of  borrowing by local governments to bank lending varies, with the highest  not more than 30 percent, the statement said. The overall scale of local  debt is therefore much smaller than reported, it said. [...]
No comments:
Post a Comment