Monday, February 27, 2012
Let Your Life Be a Friction to Stop the Machine
Transcript
Let Your Life Be a Friction to Stop the Machine
Nightmare
and insanity are akin: mysterious and involuntary states that skew and
distort objective reality. One wakens from nightmare; from insanity
there is no awakening.
Whether Americans live in the one state or the other is the paramount question of this era.
For
two hundred years Americans have been indoctrinated with a mythology
created, imposed and sustained by a manipulating cabal: the financial
elite that built its absolute control on the muscle and blood, good
will, ignorance and credulity, of its citizenry.
America
began with the invasion of a populated continent and the genocide of
its native people. Once solidly established, it grafted enslavement of
another race onto that base.
With
those two pillars of state firmly in place it declared itself an
independent nation in a document that nobly proclaimed the equality of
all mankind.
In that act of monumental hypocrisy America’s myth had its beginning.
* * *
A
Constitution was written that came to be regarded as American Holy
Writ. Its central purposes were to defend private property and suppress
mass democracy. It has fulfilled both those mandates beyond the wildest
dreams of its creators.
Once
the existing oligarchy was secure in law and native people largely
exterminated, the ruling class increased its wealth and power
fantastically in the 19th century, using the government as its enabler, exploiting to the limit the device of chartered corporations.
With
its phenomenal money power, the financial elite began to use the
military to expand its sway beyond the continent. Regions, territories,
islands, and whole countries were annexed, invaded, and possessed
outright, their peoples crushed, suppressed, and ruled.
Because
ordinary Americans, like any people, need to believe that whatever the
ruling elite undertakes in their nation’s name must be essentially
benevolent, noble in purpose and justified in fact, the myth had to be
radically modified for imperial expansion.
The
foundational story was that Americans had come to a howling wilderness
teeming with godless savages and, through invincible strength of
character and purity of purpose, had tamed the land and honorably earned
the right to possess their bountiful home.
In
the era of extra-territorial expansion that version was polished to
justify and ennoble imperialism. The new corollary was that America
could not ignore colonialist brutality but was obliged, by the Manifest
Destiny that led us to civilize our own continent, to carry our mission
into barbaric darkness wherever tyranny created abuse and suffering.
A
national myth that absolutely binds the loyalty of a people to its
government must be a subtle and powerful elixir that elevates and
aggrandizes that people’s self-regard. National policy will then appear
to be an extension of its superior citizenry’s inchoate will, and the
basis for a justified arrogance toward the lesser world.
The
simple, powerful myth of America’s altruistic and heroic benevolence,
shaped and maintained by the financial/political power elite, infused
Americans with a deep and outrageously hubristic sense of racial
superiority that, mobilized behind various imperial enterprises, has
given all such adventures the character of a quasi-religious crusade. In
this way insatiable imperialism acquires the apparent moral perfection
of a syllogism.
* * *
With
WWII, the world was reconfigured. American Capitalism emerged supreme
from the horror that had virtually wrecked its capitalist partners. The
Soviet Union, though, having absorbed by far the greatest devastation
from Nazi Germany, had astonishingly risen above its ruin to become the
leading challenger to America as a world power.
This
challenge was not competitive, it was systemic: Soviet Communism was a
direct threat to American hegemony in that it categorically refuted the
philosophical basis of Predatory Capitalism. Grounded in Marx and Lenin,
it attacked Capitalism’s inherent evils, monstrous inequities and
flagrant injustices that, exacerbated by speculation, exploitation and
fraud, would destroy it. And it promoted world revolution to that end.
This
face-off of giants in the Cold War necessitated further refinement of
the American myth. Now, instead of simply intervening in situations
where despotism or tyranny required America to forcefully implant our
just and ethical democracy, America had to become the shield and bulwark
of the sacred capitalist system in which “free enterprise” was
magically and increasingly identified with democracy and equally to be
defended.
This
version prevailed through many surrogate confrontations around the
globe in the era of Mutually Assured Destruction and survived even the
debacle of Vietnam, lasting until the collapse of the Soviet Union, as
the propaganda stream became ever more intense and pervasive. On radio
and television Americans were subjected to an unrelenting barrage of
hyper-patriotism in which American moral superiority was a given, and
America’s self-touted courage, generosity and decency were its
unchallengeable proofs.
The
implosion of the Soviet Union left America, in its own terminology, the
“Sole Superpower in a Unipolar World”. This, however, did not result in
diminution of the myth. The practical effect of having no doomsday
enemy--China couldn’t plausibly be cast in that role then--was to
supercharge it by increasing its element of pure, hubristic ego. America
was no longer just called upon to defend the “Free World” from
monstrous heresy; it was now, by virtue of its universally acknowledged,
beatific “exceptionalism”, required to oversee and police it in the
interests, and for the benefit, of lesser nations.
* * *
“Power corrupts”, said Lord Mahan, “and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
When
the only rival and counterweight to American power disintegrated there
was a sense within the American power elite that the opportunity
existed, for the first time in history, for one country to absolutely
dominate and effectively control the entire world.
This
consensus was expressed in a policy statement composed by a cadre of
major right-wing political players representing massive corporate
capitalist interests called the Project for a New American Century. This
triumphalist manifesto laid out a plan for absolute American access and
control of essential resources and raw materials worldwide, to be
guaranteed by the military which would enforce Full Spectrum Dominance.
The
American Myth, which had seemed to have lost momentum and its animating
principle in the totally unexpected so-called Cold War “victory”, was
now re-energized with a less defensive and reactive essence, and given
the glowing radiance and patina of a true and, for the first time,
self-professed and articulated, imperial mission.
The
attack on the Towers, an unimaginable provocation, was the trigger
mechanism for the explosive launch of the effort to impose that imperial
model in practice on the world.
* * *
It
has been without question the most spectacular failure in the history
of American misadventure. After a decade marked by the waste of
trillions of dollars and tens of thousands of American lives, the
stunning bankruptcy of our internally burglarized nation, and a
consequent recession more fundamentally damaging than the Great One,
Imperial America has nothing to show for the botched folly of its
arrogant overreach but unequivocal disasters in Iraq, Afghanistan, and
Pakistan, with no end of madness in sight.
An
impartial observer would have to say that the hypnotic hold of the
American Myth on the loyalty of the people has led only to disgrace and
disaster, and set a direct course to inevitable imperial decline and
ruin. That would be inarguable on any rational basis, but it entirely
mistakes the motive for, and the purpose of, the myth. The American Myth
was never intended to serve the interests either of our country or of
our people: it was created solely to buttress, shield, and exalt the
ruling financial class. It has done that with astonishing and unbroken
success that staggers the imagination from our earliest days.
The
massive looting of Iraq/Afghanistan/Pakistan war funding to enrich the
Corporate Tyranny—for that is what it has become—is on an unique scale
of its own, without anything remotely comparable to its flagrant
obscenity in the whole long history of war.
Neither
the Pentagon nor any branch of the U.S. government can give any
accounting whatever of the many billions of tax-generated dollars that
have vanished, evaporated. There is no doubt but that beyond the
outrageously inflated, no-bid contracts handed to giant corporate
favorites with their preposterous guaranteed profits, much of the money
was simply stolen in bulk by, through, or in spite of the military, and
distributed among thieves and accomplices, some of it on huge pallets…
for convenience, presumably.
* * *
While
this wholesale robbery was going on under the oversight of the military
abroad, the Corporate Tyranny had evolved a whole set of impenetrably
complex devices for the generation of money without any economically
productive source or result at home.
The
sole driving force and purpose of Capitalism is the realization of
profit. According to that calculus, reducing production costs increases
profit margin. This leads to the obvious conclusion that as production
costs near zero, profit is maximized.
There
is no provision for social good in Capitalist theory. Corporations,
created to optimize business opportunity through efficient
specialization, were originally required to operate for public benefit
but that provision was quickly finessed and forgotten.
American
law courts have always favored corporate concentrations of wealth since
they, like the Congress, exist to serve the moneyed interests. The
American Myth was created to provide cover for the financial oligarchy
to exploit the country and the citizenry, and the judiciary has
consistently cooperated in ruling for corporations against the people.
Indeed,
without ever considering the question in law, the Supreme Court long
ago endowed corporations with “personhood”, that is with all rights of
human beings under our Constitution. The way this travesty occurred--the
slipshod by-product of an obliquely related case--shows that the court
preferred to incorporate this perversion of the plain intent of the 14th
amendment as an unexamined assumption rather than risk an eventual test
which would unquestionably have created violent public outrage.
Given
the collusion of Congress and the courts in securing legal
invulnerability for the Corporate Tyranny and the principle that the
only duty of corporations is maximization of profit, it was not
surprising that megabanks, huge brokerage houses, giant insurance
conglomerates, gilded hedge funds and the credit agencies pretending to
certify their work, all engaged in massive and systemic fraud and
deception for just that purpose. The result was the crash of ’08, the
recession, and the stunning and unprecedented rescue and bailout of the
biggest banks, investment houses, and insurance and credit conglomerates
with taxpayer dollars. So much for the hallowed Invisible Hand of the
Free Market…
* * *
The
last decades have seen two related megatrends in American geopolitical
mechanics, both with dire effects on the power of the American Myth.
First, what belief the world at large had in it has been shattered by a
catastrophic series of imbecile and irretrievable military failures and
disasters, which has caused erosion of its efficacy at home. Second, in
response to this, the State has made increasingly crude efforts to boost
the Myth’s waning power by the imposition of totalitarian methods of
surveillance, intimidation and coercion on the American people to a
degree unprecedented in scope and scale.
The
whole clanking, medieval apparatus of Homeland Security that has
sprouted like an enormous poison fungus since 9/11 with its brutal
police state mindset; the odious Patriot Act with its flagrant
subversions of the Bill of Rights; the endless, fantasy-based
terror-peddling of the prostitute corporate media with its clowns and
harpies churning irrational fear and anger in the uninformed: all this
grim, repressive endeavor is a concerted attempt to distract Americans
from the real causes of their injury, abuse, and oppression.
And
yet, even with the American Myth now totally and irreparably blown full
of holes and exposed demonstrably for the tissue of lies, deceptions
and frauds that it has always been, it somehow keeps its phenomenal hold
on the great mass of the American people. The tragic reality is that,
for the majority, their own identities have been so deeply and
thoroughly infused with the myth that to disbelieve it is to disbelieve
in themselves.
* * *
So
the American Myth is dead, and yet it lives on in its deadness,
horribly masking our crapshot economy, our bankrupt debtors prison of a
society, our Ghost Dance charade of kabuki democracy, while typhoons of
impending social, economic and ecological disaster build their enormous,
lightning-charged thunderheads above the dark future before us.
And
what is it that the dead Myth still imperfectly obscures for Americans?
What is outside and beyond the opaque wall of faltering, failing
dishonesty and deception? What is the horror that the shoddy, tattered
Myth has so long and so effectively concealed?
It
is the world that has suffered unrelieved exploitation by the violence
of our imperialist mania. It is the many wrecked and pillaged economies
financially looted by our imposed predatory capitalist austerity
regimes. It is the teeming hundreds of millions of starved, deprived and
dying children sacrificed to Wall Street commodities gaming. It is the
multitudes of humble, innocent, ignorant people, barely surviving in
absolutist and dictatorial regimes propped up in their barbaric cruelty
by our military while our banks siphon off the profits left after arming
their brutal police and armies and bribing their ruling Kings, Sheikhs
or Generals. It is the millions of dead and maimed in the raped
populations of simple tribal people whom our indiscriminately murderous
juggernaut has left in its bloody wake in Iraq, Afghanistan, and
Pakistan. It is the appalling legacy of hate and repulsion, disdain and
fear, that America has earned with its appalling hegemonist villainy in
every corner of the world.
And
at home, what is it we Americans have been so complicit in hiding from
ourselves in our devotion to the perverse legend that has come to
inhabit our souls like a succubus?
It
is the millions of us with no work and no hope in middle age whose jobs
and homes have been devoured by the heartless fraud machine of Wall
Street. It is the trashed and demolished weedlots of our major cities
eroding in crumbling, fire-gutted ruin. It is the many towns and cities
with industries shut down and factories deserted or dismantled and
shipped overseas. It is our decaying, disintegrating public schools, our
bankrupt states and counties, our overtaxed, antiquated public
transportation systems, our obsolete, dissolving infrastructure, our
bloated, irrational prisons complex, our punishing and inadequate health
care disaster, and over it all, the repressive mechanism of our police
state, armed and empowered, ready for use against the American people
themselves.
* * *
This
is where we are. The great question now is whether we as a nation can
awaken from this long historic nightmare and face the terrifying and
exhilarating prospect of living in the full light of reality without the
false props and dishonest constructs of a hoodwinked, herded and
dishonored people or, whether we have internalized the falsity and
disease to such an extent that it has become an organic, overmastering
form of insanity?
In
1846, Henry David Thoreau, offended to his soul by the injustice of the
American government’s invasion of Mexico, protested it and went to jail
for his convictions. Later, in his essay On Civil Disobedience, he said
this:
“If
injustice is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of
injustice to another, then, I say, break the law. Let your life be a
counter friction to stop the machine.”
To
attempt to break the hold of the American Myth will be a titanic,
daunting challenge. To even begin to openly rebel against the might of
the National Security State will require the courage to face much more
than official disapproval and denunciation. Imperial America will not
respond to even the most peaceful and orderly protest with anything less
than hard police repression and the level of punishment will rise in
relation to the scope and seriousness of the action undertaken.
Small
protests will have no effect and will be meaningless. Organized mass
events, when they occur, will draw the whole fiercely and brutally
motivated National Security State apparatus down upon themselves.
Americans, excepting those of our underclass who have felt it, have no
experience with violent police or military repression. Those who commit
peaceful civil disobedience, a first and innocent tactic of serious
protest, will swiftly find out to their cost how it works. In a National
Security State that has excised and eradicated all defensive laws and
regulations intended to prevent abuse of the public, whatever the State
does is legal. To such a pass have we in America come as a result of our
long historic indoctrination in serving our financial elite, our Ruling
Class.
To
achieve any redemption for Americans, to make possible any more just,
humane and life-honoring society, will require complete abandonment of
the system of Predatory Capitalism. If offers no prospect of reform or
improvement and we have all been witness to the idiocy of the so-called
“democratic process” in action for generations now.
America
is nearing the greatest crisis point in its history and the terrific
cataclysm, when it happens, will determine the future our country is to
have. If we cannot, in dominating numbers, rise to reject the heartless,
mindless, soulless machine of Imperial Predatory Capitalism, we will be
condemned to a fascistic command and control horror in which human
beings are mere possessions of the State, units of production or
service, and then perhaps not even that, as excess population in that
brave, new world nay be eliminated.
That
end is not inevitable. We are not lost. We are not even defeated
because to this moment we have not engaged. We have not honored our
responsibility as human beings. We have not risen to defend our
humanity. We have let ourselves be ruled.
All
around the world the thunder of vast and immeasurable discontent can be
heard and felt. In Egypt and Spain, Jordan and Greece, Iraq and Sudan,
Afghanistan and Ireland, Latin America, the Far East and Africa, the
legitimate anger of humanity is expressing itself against the dead and
killing hand of Predatory Capitalism and its agencies of violence. And
here, in America, so long trapped and encapsulated, frozen like a fly in
amber in a false religion of state idolatry, the anger is deep,
widespread, and growing.
It
is up to those who know and care to lead. As Thomas Paine said, “These
are the times that try men’s souls.” Nothing is guaranteed us. That
can’t matter. We cannot be concerned with odds or outcomes. We cannot
let the Machine of Injustice grind on. We must oppose it with all the
moral force we own. We must act with quiet courage to confront a vicious
tyrannical system that is destroying the earth, its life, and its
people. We must put our lives on the line to oppose it.
The
Nightmare Machine of rapacious exploitation has overthrown humanity’s
decency and reason and its bloody inhuman treason flourishes over us.
This must be ended.
Let your life be a friction now to stop the Machine.
See also - The Century of the Self - How politicians and business learned to create and manipulate mass-consumer society.
Labels:
activism,
Empire,
Films,
Police State
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Time out
Due to other personal committments I've been forced to wind up this blog for the time being. Hopefully I can begin again in several months time.
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Iran's nuclear scientists are not being assassinated. They are being murdered
Guardian
On the morning of 11 January Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, the deputy head
of Iran's uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, was in his car on his
way to work when he was blown up by a magnetic bomb attached to his car door. He was 32 and married with a young son. He wasn't armed, or anywhere near a battlefield.
Since 2010, three other Iranian nuclear scientists have been killed in similar circumstances, including Darioush Rezaeinejad,
a 35-year-old electronics expert shot dead outside his daughter's
nursery in Tehran last July. But instead of outrage or condemnation, we
have been treated to expressions of undisguised glee.
"On
occasion, scientists working on the nuclear programme in Iran turn up
dead," bragged the Republican nomination candidate Rick Santorum in
October. "I think that's a wonderful thing, candidly." On the day of
Roshan's death, Israel's military spokesman, Brigadier General Yoav
Mordechai, announced on Facebook: "I don't know who settled the score with the Iranian scientist, but I certainly am not shedding a tear" – a sentiment echoed by the historian Michael Burleigh in the Daily Telegraph: "I shall not shed any tears whenever one of these scientists encounters the unforgiving men on motorbikes."
These
"men on motorbikes" have been described as "assassins". But
assassination is just a more polite word for murder. Indeed, our
politicians and their securocrats cloak the premeditated, lawless
killing of scientists in Tehran, of civilians in Waziristan, of
politicians in Gaza, in an array of euphemisms: not just assassinations
but terminations, targeted killings, drone strikes.
Labels:
assassinations,
Empire,
Gaza,
Iran,
Nuclear Weapons
Is Our Military Addicted to 'War Porn'?
The recent images in the media of uniformed U.S. Marines urinating on dead bodies
in Afghanistan rightfully invokes nearly universal condemnation.
Besides respect for the dead being somewhat of a universal human value
at this point, it is a supreme law of war for every single nation on the planet.
These
images should prompt a lot of questions here in America, about our
military, our wars, our culture and our role in global affairs. To some,
mostly the weavers and backers of war policy, it seems again that 'a
few bad apples' have acted on their own within the military, and will be
brought to justice in accordance with domestic military law.
To
others, such as myself and the majority of veterans I associate with,
the barbarity of these images is synonymous with our experiences within a
military at war. No crime our brothers and sisters commit really
surprises us anymore, but confirms to us our nation's brutal history, of
which for a time we became a part, and offers us a reminder that
nothing's really changed.
But
while our military's mission of 'engage and destroy' remains essentially
the same in Afghanistan as it has been in every other conflict, the
modes of documentation have changed, as now nearly every troop carries
his own camera into combat. From this fact flows a cinematic phenomenon
that troops and veterans recognize as 'war porn.'
War porn
means different things to different people, similar to the 'adult
material' from which it draws its name. Generally, in military and
veteran circles, war porn is recognized as any image or video produced
in a combat zone depicting death, violence, gore, brutality, depravity,
lewd behavior or any other shocking act that would be perceived
unacceptable or even criminal if committed on American soil.
Labels:
Afghanistan,
Empire,
Iraq,
Psychology,
US military
Cyber exercise 'a mental boost'
Adding virtual reality screens to exercise bikes can boost mental performance in older adults, a study has found.
Research shows regular physical activity protects against dementia and may reduce mental decline caused by normal ageing.
But this benefit can be increased with the help of virtual reality, the research suggests.
The study compared groups of participants using stationary exercise
bikes and "cybercycles" fitted with a screen giving the impression of
riding a real race on a road.
A total of 101 volunteers aged 58 to 99 took part in the Cybercycle Study. The results, published in the American Journal of Preventive
Medicine, showed a marked difference between the two groups after three
months, with Cybercycle riders having significantly better "executive"
brain function involving planning, working memory, attention and problem
solving.
They also experienced a 23% reduction in progression to mild cognitive impairment compared with the traditional exercise group.
Labels:
Health,
Neurology,
Virtual Reality
Dementia Study: Nicotine Can Improve Memory
Nicotine patches can improve the memory of elderly patients in the early stages of mental decline, according to new research.
The
pilot study, although too small to provide clinically conclusive
results, found the patches improved memory, attention and mental
processing in those with mild memory problems.
The research has prompted new interest in whether nicotine could be
used to develop treatments to delay the onset of Alzheimer's and other
forms of dementia.
Scientists in the US monitored a group of 67 people with mild
cognitive impairment (MCI) over a period of six months, carrying out
memory and "thinking skill" tests to assess their mental function.
Half of the participants, whose average age was 76, were given a
daily nicotine skin patch, contacting 15 milligrams of the drug.
The others were asked to wear a placebo patch, containing no active medication.
By the end of the six months, the nicotine-treated group had regained
46% of normal long-term memory for their age. Their ability to pay
attention had also improved.
UK rendition and torture collusion inquiry scrapped
Oh, the shock....Oh the surprise....Another whitewash.
BBC News
A controversial inquiry into allegations of wrongdoing by the UK's security services is being scrapped. Justice Secretary Ken Clarke said the inquiry into the
treatment of detainees could not continue because of Metropolitan Police
investigations.
These follow fresh allegations that officials assisted the rendition of men to Libya, where they were tortured. Mr Clarke said the government was committed to holding a judge-led inquiry once these were investigated.
The Detainee Inquiry, headed by retired judge Sir Peter
Gibson, was launched by the prime minister to get to the bottom of
claims that MI5 and MI6 had aided and abetted the rendition and
ill-treatment of terrorism suspects in the wake of 9/11.
In July 2010 when he announced the "fully independent"
inquiry, David Cameron had said that to ignore the claims of wrongdoing
would risk secret operatives' reputation "being tarnished". But the inquiry had been widely criticised by campaign groups
and lawyers representing detainees who were refusing to take part,
saying it lacked transparency and credibility.
When is a terrorist state not a terrorist state? When it's Israel
It isn’t difficult to imagine how Western governments would react if a foreign state assassinated its scientists, blew up its military facilities, or carried out bomb attacks on army officers, while heads of that state’s intelligence agency dropped hints that ‘There are more bullets in the magazine’.
Such actions would be universally condemned as terrorism. The state responsible would be categorised as a ‘terrorist state’ or a ‘sponsor of terrorism’, whose behaviour violated international law and codes of conduct that govern the ‘international community’. Pariah status would follow. Governments might withdraw their diplomats. There would be condemnation in the UN Security Council, and calls for sanctions or even war.
But when that state is Israel the response is strangely muted, and more often than not non-existent.
Years ago, Israel’s dovish Prime Minister Moshe Sharett condemned the kidnapping and murder of 5 Jordanian Bedouin by Israeli paratroopers in 1955 and speculated in his diary that such acts ‘must make the State appear in the eyes of the world as a savage state that does not recognize the principles of justice as they have been established and accepted by contemporary society.’
More than half a century later, Israel continues to operate on the principle that it can kill who it wants, when it wants and wherever it wants, secure in the knowledge that such actions will draw little or no condemnation amongst Western governments, which are in Israel’s eyes, the only governments that matter.
Such actions would be universally condemned as terrorism. The state responsible would be categorised as a ‘terrorist state’ or a ‘sponsor of terrorism’, whose behaviour violated international law and codes of conduct that govern the ‘international community’. Pariah status would follow. Governments might withdraw their diplomats. There would be condemnation in the UN Security Council, and calls for sanctions or even war.
But when that state is Israel the response is strangely muted, and more often than not non-existent.
Years ago, Israel’s dovish Prime Minister Moshe Sharett condemned the kidnapping and murder of 5 Jordanian Bedouin by Israeli paratroopers in 1955 and speculated in his diary that such acts ‘must make the State appear in the eyes of the world as a savage state that does not recognize the principles of justice as they have been established and accepted by contemporary society.’
More than half a century later, Israel continues to operate on the principle that it can kill who it wants, when it wants and wherever it wants, secure in the knowledge that such actions will draw little or no condemnation amongst Western governments, which are in Israel’s eyes, the only governments that matter.
Labels:
assassinations,
Iran,
Israel,
Terrorism
IRAN: TEN REASONS TO PROTEST AGAINST WAR AND SANCTIONS

- NO THREAT. Iran has not attacked any country in more than 200 years. Its military spending per capita is among the lowest in the region. The regime has allowed inspections and agreed to negotiate with the West on all issues. Current Western rhetoric recalls the Iraq war, when a threat was fabricated to justify an attack.
- DOUBLE STANDARDS. Many of the West's allies, including Israel, have nuclear weapons. There is no evidence that Iran is developing them, as last year's IAEA report made clear. Iran, unlike Israel and Pakistan, is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, under which it has the right to develop civilian nuclear power.
- SANCTIONS LEAD TO WAR. As the recent military standoff has shown, sanctions are increasing tension and distrust. They will strengthen the hawks in Iran. In Iraq, sanctions resulted in a genocidal level of civilian casualties and brought nothing but death and suffering to the Iraqi people. Sanctions were not a stepping stone to peace, but to war.
- CATASTROPHIC CONSEQUENCES. Any attack on Iran will lead to thousands of casualties and provoke retaliation with devastating effects across the region. Sanctions and war will drive up the cost of oil, creating further havoc to a world economy already in crisis.
- LESSONS FROM THE PAST. If the attacks on Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya teach anything, it is that military intervention brings death, division and misery. 30,000 died in Libya, tens of thousands in Afghanistan, and a million in Iraq. Violence continues in all three countries.
- WAR = CUTS IN WELFARE. Barack Obama recently committed to military expenditure above the levels of George W. Bush's administration. Britain spent hundreds of millions bombing Libya and is spending £6 billion a year on the war in Afghanistan. An attack on Iran could have far greater financial implications, leading the government to threaten yet more cuts in welfare and public services.
- DEMOCRACY. Recent wars have been deeply unpopular at home and have created a democratic deficit. Plans have been laid in Washington and Whitehall for an attack on Iran, with neither elected politicians in parliament nor the electorate, being consulted.
- SECURITY. The War on Terror has made the world a more volatile and dangerous place. An attack on Iran can only increase bitterness against the Western powers.
- CIVIL LIBERTIES. The campaign against Iran will lead to further demonisation of Britain’s Muslim community and more curbs on our freedom, dressed up as 'anti terror measures'.
- WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE. The main restraining factor on the war makers is mobilised public opinion. Even George W. Bush opposed Israel attacking Iran while in office, because he felt Americans were against it. The voice of the anti-war majority in Britain must be turned into a mass movement that forces our political leaders to end their policy of endless war.
Open Source, Transparent, Global Voting

approvedvoices.org
Half Past Human
First a disclaimer...i don't vote. Can't stand the control mechanisms
put into place over the voting system. It is the same in every country.
The evil central banksters, officialdom, masons, and the 'party' system
control the vote. So i don't. No point.
But, there are times i would like to be able to vote. Usually there are no personalities among the scum floating to the top of the political pond worth wasting breath cursing. Some though, such as Ron Paul, do say all the correct words, and may be the correct person for the karios of the moment. But, as i say, i do not vote....because it is rigged. Certainly here in the USA, and likely everywhere.
It was this last thought that brought forth the screwy idea....since they are trying to control voting by clamping down on the local through national level, why not 'occupy' the vote by taking the vote in Olympia, WA State, global? That is, if i knew that my vote could be tallied globally, by anyone, and everyone, would that make me trust the system more?
Well, in my case, yes. As a computer software designer, i would love to be able to reach out and tally/monitor the vote in any region/locality globally. Why? Well, probably just because i am nosy, but there is a real point to it. If i could determine that the vote in a parish in Louisiana had been locally (in Louisiana) reported inaccurately, they could be called on the crime. Now, as the saying goes, "if you ain't diebold, you CAN'T know".
So, here is a screwy idea, released out into the wild....for all those legions of unemployed programmers... open source, transparent, global voting system.
But, there are times i would like to be able to vote. Usually there are no personalities among the scum floating to the top of the political pond worth wasting breath cursing. Some though, such as Ron Paul, do say all the correct words, and may be the correct person for the karios of the moment. But, as i say, i do not vote....because it is rigged. Certainly here in the USA, and likely everywhere.
It was this last thought that brought forth the screwy idea....since they are trying to control voting by clamping down on the local through national level, why not 'occupy' the vote by taking the vote in Olympia, WA State, global? That is, if i knew that my vote could be tallied globally, by anyone, and everyone, would that make me trust the system more?
Well, in my case, yes. As a computer software designer, i would love to be able to reach out and tally/monitor the vote in any region/locality globally. Why? Well, probably just because i am nosy, but there is a real point to it. If i could determine that the vote in a parish in Louisiana had been locally (in Louisiana) reported inaccurately, they could be called on the crime. Now, as the saying goes, "if you ain't diebold, you CAN'T know".
So, here is a screwy idea, released out into the wild....for all those legions of unemployed programmers... open source, transparent, global voting system.
Read more
Labels:
Banksters,
Corporatism,
Elections,
Elite,
Information technology,
Internet,
Voting
Unplug Yourself: How Advertising and Entertainment Shapes Your Subconscious
Andre Evans
They say the subconscious is more powerful than the conscious. Usually,
people are more influenced by their innate subconscious desires or
intent than a rational and planned decision. This aspect of human nature
is heavily influenced by your daily activity.
How Corporations Influence Your Subconscious
In western society, the subconscious mind of the individual is often subject to a number of heavy influences, through entertainment mediums especially. Television, movies, and music create a profound subconscious effect on the human mind that influences and dictates the choices that they will make to at least some degree.
If you see a certain car advertisement, whether or not you rationally decide your stance on it, you are being pre-programmed to at least accept or acknowledge any claims made by the advertisement itself.
Likewise, the choice of television shows and dramatic elements appearing on TV have a psychological influence on those who watch them. According to statistics, by age 18 the average American youth will have seen over 200,000 simulated acts of violence. The glorification of drug and alcohol use predisposes an individual to rationally accept and sometimes consent to these actions.
The human self image is psychologically manipulated. When you compare yourself to a famous individual or a person who is depicted as 'successful', you may be setting yourself up to subconsciously feel less valuable from the comparison. This subconscious act creates people who are wildly insecure about their physical and mental image.
Romance and sex is also psychologically implanted through advertisements and drama. The use of sex appeal to sell products is obvious. Similarly, dramatic scenes of love and romantic feelings often prey on the human desire to feel loved, and will program an individual to act or react to those situations in certain ways. Displays of sexual suggestiveness and simulated depictions of sexual relations in media all contribute to influencing increased sexual activity in young people. Not only that, but they also lead to unhealthy obsession with sex into later years, generally resulting in pornography usage.
Its not just television and movies either. With internet advertising, viral videos depicting most of these things in horrific detail, and video games, a horde of negative media pervades over society. This power of subconscious influence guides and decides the goals, desires, and opinions of each individual.
A blurring of reality with fiction occurs in this scenario, where the individual is influenced to orient themselves in alignment with these false goals and aspirations that are implanted into them through these mediums. In extreme cases, their ability to distinguish reality from fiction is impaired, and culminates in some explosive form. If you add drugs to the entire equation (legal or illegal), you may end up with self destruction.
How Corporations Influence Your Subconscious
In western society, the subconscious mind of the individual is often subject to a number of heavy influences, through entertainment mediums especially. Television, movies, and music create a profound subconscious effect on the human mind that influences and dictates the choices that they will make to at least some degree.
If you see a certain car advertisement, whether or not you rationally decide your stance on it, you are being pre-programmed to at least accept or acknowledge any claims made by the advertisement itself.
Likewise, the choice of television shows and dramatic elements appearing on TV have a psychological influence on those who watch them. According to statistics, by age 18 the average American youth will have seen over 200,000 simulated acts of violence. The glorification of drug and alcohol use predisposes an individual to rationally accept and sometimes consent to these actions.
The human self image is psychologically manipulated. When you compare yourself to a famous individual or a person who is depicted as 'successful', you may be setting yourself up to subconsciously feel less valuable from the comparison. This subconscious act creates people who are wildly insecure about their physical and mental image.
Romance and sex is also psychologically implanted through advertisements and drama. The use of sex appeal to sell products is obvious. Similarly, dramatic scenes of love and romantic feelings often prey on the human desire to feel loved, and will program an individual to act or react to those situations in certain ways. Displays of sexual suggestiveness and simulated depictions of sexual relations in media all contribute to influencing increased sexual activity in young people. Not only that, but they also lead to unhealthy obsession with sex into later years, generally resulting in pornography usage.
Its not just television and movies either. With internet advertising, viral videos depicting most of these things in horrific detail, and video games, a horde of negative media pervades over society. This power of subconscious influence guides and decides the goals, desires, and opinions of each individual.
A blurring of reality with fiction occurs in this scenario, where the individual is influenced to orient themselves in alignment with these false goals and aspirations that are implanted into them through these mediums. In extreme cases, their ability to distinguish reality from fiction is impaired, and culminates in some explosive form. If you add drugs to the entire equation (legal or illegal), you may end up with self destruction.
Labels:
advertising,
Corporatism,
Films,
Internet,
Marketing,
Mind Control,
Psychology,
social engineering,
Television
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



