Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Satanism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Satanism. Show all posts

Sunday, 16 November 2025

On Systemic Demoralization, and the Possibility of Overcoming It

Josh Del Sol | Take Back Your Power.net (2023)

Until we resolve and heal the root effects of having been systematically demoralized, even forces for good will be trapped to behave in cowardly and self-sabotaging ways… and make excuses for it.

When we do not speak and act what we feel is true, but rather submit to do what we feel / know is out of alignment, we self-betray, diminish our alignment with natural law and thus experience a loss of energy.

Watch the video at the top for a precise explanation of how we’ve been systematically demoralized, from a former KGB agent-turned-whistleblower. (source)

Though, what this video doesn’t include is how the dark veil of mind control is being powered by a fuel source comprised of the soul-energy and blood of millions of abused and sacrificed children and fetuses. The dark ones (and the humans who have lost so much soul from “hating the truth” that they have become possessed to a lesser/greater extent) have only ONE AGENDA, with different arms. (And yes, the wireless sub-agenda is part of it. I have mentioned teslaphoresis before; a coming phase of my work will come back to include awareness & solution in this area.)

For connecting dots, remember, Epstein was so close with Gates that Epstein asked Gates to be his executor! And as many are now aware, the globalist plan includes injecting us all with not just tracking technology and rna-modifying code, but also with the physical material of those sacrificed — since even aborted human embryonic substance has been included in ‘vaccines’ for some time already, according to top industry executives’ own admissions, e.g. in interviews, vaccine labels, etc.

Read more

Wednesday, 5 November 2025

Are the U.S. and E.U. Governments Satanic?

John leake | Focal Points

As we related in our book, The Courage to Face COVID-19, just before Dr. McCullough departed to Washington D.C. for his Senate testimony on November 19, 2020, he had a disturbing conversation with his church pastor, Andrew Forrest.

“We don’t understand what’s happening in our world,” McCullough explained. “My YouTube videos about early treatment were taken down, and then my planned WebEx conference with an Australian MP about treatment was hacked. Now my hospital administrators are acting like I’m out of line for accepting a U.S. Senator’s invitation to testify about the disease. It’s as though, for the first time in history, our medical system is opposed to caring for the sick. What on earth is going on?”

Andrew wasn’t at all surprised.

“There are times when evil prevails over good in a large way,” he said. “We know from the dark periods of history that this has happened before, and now it’s happening again. What you describe is Satan working in the hearts and minds of people, sowing fear, confusion, and anger. All you can do is keeping trying to do good until it turns the tide. For your Senate speech, your message must be joyous and happy and clear, uncluttered by negative emotion. That way you will let the light of God shine forth in this darkness.

At the time Dr. McCullough told me this story, I thought that Pastor Forrest was being melodramatic. Surely, I thought, what he was describing was ordinary human fear and stupidity, and not the work of a supernatural being—a malevolent spirit called “Satan.”

Since then, I have been increasingly drawn to the conclusion that Pastor Forrest was onto something.

Even if one rejects the idea of the devil as a supernatural spirit that actually exists, a rational and impartial observer will still marvel at how large masses of humans will suddenly—as if infected with a spiritual contagion—participate in an irrational and highly destructive enterprise.

In researching my forthcoming book, Mind Viruses: America’s Irrational Obsessions, I examined how the “Devil” has been depicted in literature going back to the Bible.

The Greek word for devil, diĆ”bolos, means “the one who divides.” The English word “diabolic” comes from the Greek verb diabollein, which means “to tear apart.”

Read more 

Monday, 29 April 2019

Satanic Temple Wins IRS Recognition as an Official House of Worship

bloomberg.com

 

Many Americans regard paying taxes as a necessary evil. If they want to worship Satan, now the IRS has officially given them a tax-exempt place to do so.

 The Internal Revenue Service has granted the same non-profit status given to churches, synagogues and mosques to The Satanic Temple, an organization in Salem, Massachusetts, that calls itself America’s first devil-worshiping church. It is now protected by federal laws governing churches that operate as charities. 

In a statement this week announcing the status, the group called itself “a non-theistic religious organization dedicated to Satanic practice and the promotion of Satanic rights.” Based in the town that hosted the Salem Witch Trials in the 17th century, the statement added that the group “understands the Satanic figure as a symbol of man’s inherent nature, representative of the eternal rebel, enlightened inquiry and personal freedom rather than a supernatural deity or being.” 

Before the ruling, the IRS regarded the group as a “religious organization,” not as a full-fledged church with a place of worship. Churches are generally exempt from filing federal returns under the tax code.

Wednesday, 13 December 2017

Pedophilia & Empire: Satan, Sodomy, & The Deep State: Chapter 1: Introduction to Pedophilia - The Mental Disorder and the Child Sex Abuse Crime

Comment: New Kindle book series by Joachim Hagopian. His blog is American Empire Exposed.

-------------------------

From the book description at Amazon.com:

"The notion that pedophilia is a permanent, immutable condition inherited from birth is a slippery slope that some believe may relinquish self-responsibility for abusing children, which moves toward potentially normalizing and decriminalizing pedophilia, with the precedent of homosexuality already in place. A growing number of researchers believe that most child molesters are not pedophiles and that a sizeable yet unknown percentage of pedophiles live a celibate lifestyle never touching or harming children. It’s important to realize that satanic pedophiles amongst the elite will use these latest findings to their advantage. Changing societal mores leading toward increasing leniency, normalcy and decriminalization will only justify their continuing to feed off the flesh and blood of children for rejuvenated strength, longer life and enhanced power practiced since ancient times. Ritualized sacrifice of young innocents through systematic rape, torture and wholesale slaughter perpetrated by the Illuminati elite has secretly flourished to this day with total impunity."

www.amazon.com/


Tuesday, 29 July 2014

Mythical Numbers and Satanic Ritual Abuse

Ross E. Cheit
Huffington Post

It's a mythical number that skeptics never question. And it's come up again and again in the national press for decades. It's purportedly the number of victims from the infamous child sexual abuse cases of the 1980s and 1990s. Not child victims, though. The victims are said to be adults who were falsely charged and often convicted of sexual abuse, victims of a witch-hunt. Christina Hoff Sommers used the number just a few weeks ago in a Time column, referring to those cases and writing that "hundreds of innocent adults faced charges of ritual child abuse."

The number of accused or jailed is always impressive. The abuse is always dismissed as imaginary. The cases are always cast as witch-hunts, with a narrative typically full of lurid details. The alarming words ritual or satanic -- sometimes both -- are often added for good measure. The witch-hunt narrative has been bolstered by scores of articles and books. But the numbers don't add up. There's no evidence of hundreds of cases of false convictions of child sexual abuse in this era.

In my new book, The Witch-Hunt Narrative, I examine dozens of specific cases from the 1980s and early 90s. In many of the cases proclaimed to be witch hunts, looking closely at the record revealed substantial evidence of abuse and compelling reasons that jurors voted to convict. It's true that I also found cases where people were charged who shouldn't have been. Yet even in some of those cases, there was strong evidence of abuse. A crime was committed and a child was assaulted by someone who was never apprehended, but only the false accusation story lives on.

Read more

Friday, 2 May 2014

First Look at the New Satanic Monument Being Built for Oklahoma’s Statehouse




Here’s the First Look at the New Satanic Monument Being Built for Oklahoma’s Statehouse

In January the Satanic Temple announced plans to erect a monument glorifying the Dark Lord on the front lawn of the Oklahoma Statehouse. An Indiegogo campaign was launched with what seemed like a somewhat lofty goal of $20,000, but by the time donations ended almost $30,000 had been raised. Now an artist trained in classical sculpture is toiling away in New York, crafting a Baphomet figure sitting beneath a pentagram and flanked by two children gazing upward in loyalty. When it is finished, it will be cast in bronze and, the Satanists hope, eventually displayed in Oklahoma.

The statue is a direct response to the state’s installation of a Ten Commandments monument outside the Capitol in 2012. State Representative Mike Ritze paid for the controversial statue with his own money, and therefore it was considered a donation and OK to place on government property. Following that line of reasoning, the Satanic Temple submitted a formal application for their monument.

As Trait Thompson of the Oklahoma Capitol Preservation Commission told CNN last December, “Individuals and groups are free to apply to place a monument or statue or artwork.” The applications are then approved or rejected by the Commission. Unfortunately, the state has placed a halt on issuing permits for any other monuments until a lawsuit filed by the ACLU against Ritze’s Commandments monument is settled.

Read more

Monday, 12 December 2011

The mystery of Carole Myers


While there is little doubt in my mind that institutional and intra-familial ritual sexual abuse exists in our societies it is also true to say that some minds can be highly susceptible to implanted memories. Clearly the sensitivity of some individuals towards such false memories cannot be discounted. The following article illustrates the point well. However, keep in mind that FMS (False Memory Syndrome) and the over-active imagination of therapists and clinicians alike must never be used as an excuse to discount ALL cases of ritual sexual abuse, especially at the Establishment level that is immersed in occult traditions, some of which are undoubtedly satanic.  An awareness of both is the key.

---------------------

carole myers
The girl we knew: Carole Myers as a newly qualified nurse, 
in the early 80s. Photograph: Will Storr for the Observer

At 9.02am Richard Felstead answered the phone; by 9.03am he was breathless with crying. It was the coroner's assistant in Battersea with the news that his sister, Carole, had died two weeks earlier. "I'm sorry it's taken so long to notify you," she said. "Carole's next of kin told us there was no family. But a letter was found – from you."

Two minutes later, the phone rang again. A different caller, with a strange voice, said, "I know you're not one of the ones that harmed Carole."

"Who are you?" said Richard.
"I'm Carole's next of kin."
"What's your name?"
"That's not important."
"How did Carole die?"
"She had a very difficult childhood."
"What? No she didn't."

"The cremation's tomorrow. People have taken time off work. It's very important it goes ahead."
Richard reacted furiously. The phone went dead.

The brothers gathered at their parents' Stockport home: Richard, David, Anthony and Kevin, whose principal memory of the morning of 14 July 2005 is his mother, "Finished. On the floor. Drained. Shattered. Gone." They began talking. Who was the mysterious caller who claimed to be Carole's "next of kin"? Why did she talk of a "difficult childhood" when Carole was happy and popular? She had a successful nursing career down in London. How could she die at just 41? Why had it taken two weeks to be informed? How could there be a funeral tomorrow?

Joseph, their father, stood up. "I'll put a stop to it."

"You can't stop a funeral, Dad!" said Kevin.

Joseph phoned the coroner's assistant. She brusquely informed him that, now the family had been discovered, the funeral would be halted. She mentioned a "life assessment", written by Carole. "It's very upsetting," she said. It was six pages, typed.

It said: "My parents were abusive in every way imaginable − sexually, physically and emotionally. At three years of age, my mother smothered my sister. She sat me on top of her body and set the house on fire."

Joseph was astonished. "Had she been ill?" he said. "Had she been sectioned?"

The coroner's assistant replied: "Yes."

Over the coming weeks there came more questions. They were told the nameless "next of kin" had emptied Carole's flat and driven off in her car. Officials kept mentioning a "psychiatrist friend" who accompanied Carole to medical appointments. Joseph was speaking to a police inspector when something occurred to him. "This psychiatrist and this next of kin," he said. "Are they the same person?"

"That's right," said the inspector. "Dr Fleur Fisher."

The Felsteads' search for answers to the many mysteries surrounding Carole's decline is now in its sixth year. Endless letters and FOI requests, alongside hours of legal research and long nights on the internet, have resulted in the collection of hundreds of documents and the generation of yet more questions: angry ones about individuals they believe to have been malign presences in her life; strange ones about startling and little-known corners of human psychology; sad ones about the life and death of the kind and sparky woman they still miss every day.

When I tell them I'd like to write about Carole, they pass me the telephone number, discovered in Carole's phone records, of the woman whose role in the tale is, they're convinced, both sinister and central: that of the "next of kin", Dr Fleur Fisher.

"I'm not sure I want to talk about this," Fisher tells me. "You'll have to let me think about it. That family – they're bloody terrifying."

"You're frightened of them?"

"They're frightening people. And the things they've been saying," she says, adding confusingly: "I'm not a therapist!" She rings off, warning me darkly: "Tread carefully."

Read more 

See also: 

Sex, Lies and Society Part V



Sunday, 4 December 2011

Satanic priests in the Catholic Church?


Press TV
Press TV interview with international war crimes lawyer Alfred Lambremont Webre. 

The Catholic Church is facing pedophilia charges while seven adults have filed lawsuits accusing a California priest of child sex abuse between 1972 and up until 2001.

The plaintiffs, who include six women and one man, say they were abused by father Stephen Kiesle. They go on to say the Catholic Church has long facilitated the molestation of children by protecting the well-known child molesting priests.

This is the latest of several lawsuits where individuals say the Catholic Church is closing its eyes to sexual abuse of children by priests and church officials. The church has paid out more than 400,000 million dollars to victims of clergy sex abuse.

The following is a transcription with Alfred Lambremont Webre, who is an international lawyer specializing in war crimes. Mr. Webre shares his insights regarding these types of cases and explains how the Catholic Church has a dark history of satanic sexual abuse, which taints the hierarchal structure of the church from the father all the way up to the Pope.

Press TV: To discuss this scandal further, we are being joined by international lawyer Alfred Lambremont Webre from Vancouver, Canada. Many thanks for joining us here on Press TV. This case is not an isolated incident. There are reports alleging the current Pope being involved in a massive cover-up for the sake of the Church. Now with the Vatican's defense being that one cannot prosecute the head of a state, can there be no justice as far as the upper echelons of the church go?

Webre:I think that in this case it's not the Vatican which is being sued here. It's the diocese of Oakland so that this case can go forward. What is very interesting is the evidence in this case which is the lavation file of the accused former priest. There's a letter in there that bears the signature of the former Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who is now Pope Benedict XVI and there was a letter to diocese officials in which Ratzinger, the current Pope, said that the arguments for removing the accused priest were quote, "of grave significance and that the action required careful review and more time." So in this case we have the evidence with the current pope's own signature that he signed so as to protect this particular priest more and to give it more time. Now people are saying that this is a pattern of protecting the church from embarrassment. Let's turn this around. Suppose Cardinal Ratzinger, the current pope, was actually running a sexual abuse ring for "satanic worshipers" using Satanism and using sexual abuse. They were actually encouraging sexual abuse by priests on children around the world as part of a "Satanic Ritual." That's what this looks like to me as a lawyer, as a war crimes lawyer. Actually, the current Pope was covering up satanic rituals of sex abuse within the current Catholic Church, and here we have his signature of "Pope Benedict XVI" (Cardinal Ratzinger) on the letter of Stephen Keiser who's the accused priest. We have his signature and that's the evidence in this case. They can't plead sovereign immunity because it's the diocese of Oakland that is being sued.

Press TV: The church has paid millions of dollars to victims of clergy sex abuse. Now will the extent of punishment here go just as far as defaulting?

Webre: You know, there is no dollar amount you can really put on the pain and suffering of these individuals and this is really a war crime. You have a major church, a major institution, which has been committing a fraud against the children of the world, against the families of the world, and maybe a satanic organization in our midst, and has committed war crimes against humanity as that is understood under the various conventions. So, there is no price here. What exactly was the intent of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger? We know he has Nazi ties from his childhood.

Press TV: Now with such large numbers of lawsuits being filed against members of the Catholic Church, how would you assess its standing with its thousands of worshipers around the world now?

Webre: Well, you know that's a good question. Because you have a hierarchy that is in serious trouble, and does not want to look at their actions. They are hiding behind improper defenses like sovereign immunity, that it's a state as if it goes back to a decision when they were the Holy Roman Empire. It was the Roman Emperor around 300 AD that marked into the Pope. That is what we have. We have the former Roman Emperor who's now in the Vatican in Rome. This is a historical fact. And for a religious, ethical and moral leader to hide behind the defense of sovereign immunity on a criminal prosecution of moral turpitude is beyond the pale. So, whether or not the Roman Catholic Church will survive this crisis, depends on how they are reacting. So far, they are not reacting well. Women have come forward and have wanted to be priests. They have been rebuffed completely. It appears as though Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the current Pope) signature is all over the crimes that have been committed here, and as an attorney, I can tell you we have a big case of "Satanism" here with the Robert Picton cases here in Canada. So, I would say that, investigators should start looking at the Catholic Church as a possible "Satanic Organization."

Press TV: I'm afraid we will have to leave it there. That was international lawyer Alfred Lambremont Webre speaking to us from Vancouver. Many thanks for your insights here on Press TV. 


See also:

In the Name of the Father Part III 




Wednesday, 12 October 2011

Men Who Hate Women: The Franklin Scandal and the Truth About Our Leaders


Excellent if very disturbing article from Mr. Koehli:

-----------------

Franklin scandal

MƤn som hatar kvinnor - 'Men Who Hate Women'. That's the original Swedish title of Stieg Larsson's runaway best-seller, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Those who have read the novel or seen the Swedish film adaptation know that it's the perfect description. Larsson weaves a story of rape, sadism, spousal abuse, human trafficking, white-collar crime, and political corruption around the iconic characters of Lisbeth Salander and investigative journalist Mikael Blomkvist. Yeah, it may just be a novel, but after the research I've been doing lately, I'm convinced that there's more to the Larsson's subject matter than just a page-turning good read. As the character 'V' put it in V for Vendetta, "Artists use lies to tell the truth, while politicians use them to cover the truth up." That's the truth, and if I've learned anything in recent years, it's that truth is stranger than fiction, and even more disturbing.

While I'm a fan of Larsson's work, and fiction in general, there's something to be said about true accounts. They have a way of 'seating' in the mind, making what was at first only 'interesting' and perhaps 'entertaining' fiction become real: solid, vital, life-altering. Fiction gives us the truth, but at a distance. It's up to the reader to divine the real-life applications and implications. But when they become clear, it can be a profound and painful experience. It's all too easy to take the easy way out when that experience is just too painful, with the potential of shattering too many deeply held illusions about the way reality really works. "It's just a story, after all." Those six curiosity-killing words are enough to prevent a person from doing the research to see that there may be more to a story than just the product of a good imagination. There may be a disturbing underbelly to the surface events of everyday life. In my case, that's where real-life investigative reporter Nick Bryant's 2009 book The Franklin Scandal: A Story of Powerbrokers, Child Abuse & Betrayal comes into the story. It's the book that made a lot of things hit home for me, and it was absolutely devastating.

Bryant is a professional journalist, having published articles in many 'mainstream' newspapers and journals. But after deciding to research the infamous 'Franklin scandal' of the late '80s and early '90s, no mainstream editor would take his story. It was just too hard to believe. For those readers unfamiliar with the scandal, you can watch a never-aired documentary produced by UK-based Yorkshire Television titled Conspiracy of Silence. The documentary was commissioned by Discovery Channel, who pulled out at the last minute. Luckily, someone with access to a rough cut of the piece leaked it and Bryant has made it freely available on his website, here. The Frankliln Scandal not only confirms what the Yorkshire team presented, but adds reams of new details and documents demonstrating a level of criminality, corruption, perversion of justice, and sadism that is simply mind-blowing.

Monday, 25 July 2011

Deadly Compassion Part IV


NAMBLA is an extremely tame organization compared to others. NAMBLA would say, for example, that they are opposed to forcible sexual contact with children. Other organizations are not. 
– Andrew Vachss, author, child advocate

Statistics

Although child abuse has always existed the ways which we manage the victims of these crimes has obviously changed with the times. With such a sensitive, complex and poorly understood subject, statistics will always remain controversial in that they are able to shape our perceptions so effectively for whatever agenda is being proposed.

The statistics on sex crime and sexual abuse are some of the most hotly contested of all media reports. Child abuse has been placed in the spotlight yet without the requisite caution and objectivity, courtesy of politicians and the mainstream media. None of the statistics quoted in this series of articles have a unanimous consensus. All are disputed and fought over according to which particular camp the group or individual belongs to. Different definitions and purposes will dictate the outcome of even the most objective data. Sexual abuse is, by nature, highly charged with emotion and instincts, thus a clear statistical appraisal of this phenomena will always be to some degree flawed. Yet how can we know by how much a general heightened awareness has caused the seeming rise in child abuse? Can we differentiate between a rise in the number of cases and an increase in the actual incidences of abuse? How is it possible to formulate definitions of abuse when controversy over these definitions has not been resolved? Author and Child activist Andrew Vachss explains:

I don’t think child abuse has changed. I do think that reporting has changed. When people pick up a newspaper today, they are likely to read about some case of child abuse. I don’t think fifty years ago that was true. In fact, I know it was not. So, if you look at child abuse statistics, which didn’t exist, say, in 1955, and then you looked at them today, you’d say, ‘Oh my God, child abuse has increased into this huge epidemic.’ My suggestion is that there’s no proof that child abuse, in and of itself, has increased. There is proof that case-finding techniques have increased, and reporting has increased. 1

The very nature of quantitative and qualitative statistical analysis and data gathering is prone to serious bias and belief systems of the researchers and is open to political manipulations. As we will discover, abuse serves an important purpose in this regard. In such a highly contentious field of enquiry the “butterfly effect” applied to data changes that are erroneous and sourced from ideology, beliefs and supposition can result in big differences in the final studies on abuse and neglect. 
 
When the media is told to get behind whatever propagated statistic is deemed useful to those in power then it is almost assured that this truth, or this lie will become a household “norm.” For example, which would you trust? Studies that collect official government statistics or studies that offers the opportunity for anonymous, independent collection and retrospective data gathering from professionals on the ground? The latter would be my preference. However, if the media has some shocking statistics and does not provide anyway to evaluate their authenticity or access to relevant information which could show how these statistics were obtained, then it is very easy to support one’s headline and the associated belief, whatever that may be. 
 
Statistics are uniformly used to substantiate loud proclamations when an argument may be weak. As statistics have the stamp of officialdom and authority, people automatically take numbers as facts. In the world of abuse this can and does lead to severe problems for all, but an easy and useful tool for the Establishment. When well meaning social activism gets the wind in its sails, they can often be a pawn in the chess game of covert forces at work. Innumeracy and lack of critical thinking ensures the game is played out resulting in a “social comedy” that can nevertheless have dire consequences as one writer describes:

“‘Activists want to draw attention to a problem. . . The press asks for statistics. . . Knowing that big numbers indicate a big problems and knowing that it will be hard to get action unless people can be convinced a big problem exists (and sincerely believing that there is a big problem), the activists produce a big estimate, and the press, having no good way to check the number, simply publicizes it. The general public – most of us suffering from at least a mild case of innumeracy – tends to accept the figure without question.’” 2

The article goes on to mention three basic questions to keep in mind when presented with statistics: Who created the statistic? Why was the statistic created and how? It becomes apparent then the identities, history and data gathering of the experts are key component in the support or suspicion of statistics. The National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect (NCCAN) remains one of the best and by all accounts the most accurate resources available.

An overriding thought to be aware of is the persistent logic that most reports will not come to the attention of the authorities (assuming these authorities are not implicated in abuse themselves) and we can thus say that sexual abuse may be more common than we think. “Substantiated cases” in the US and “registered children” in the UK are an example of how many cases never reach social services let alone the courts. Children and young adults cannot and will not report their abuser to authorities due to the nature of the crime that is deeply entrenched in social taboos. This is particularly the case with incest (otherwise known as intra-familial abuse). 
 
Overall, statistics are extremely easy to manipulate if they serve a long term agenda. For example, violent crime took a large jump in early 2006 which is hardly surprising coming as it does on the back of a number of new draconian laws related to “protecting freedoms.” In the true style we have come to expect from American institutions: “The FBI report did not give any explanation why the violent crime numbers and murders went up last year, but Justice Department officials said during a news briefing that the government's policies were not to blame.” 3 Of course, that seems fair. “We have no idea but it isn’t our policies that are reshaping US society.” In reality, we may be witnessing a dramatic increase and / or reporting of child sexual abuse rather than the much vaunted decrease by US authorities.

There is evidence that FBI and Department of Justice can be rather selective with their statistics if they can get away with it. Some of the ways in which these data are distorted include:
  • Reducing child sex abuse rates by deleting official data on sex abuse of children under 12;
  • Eliminating sodomy of boys by reclassifying boys in an ageless —male rape category;
  • Lowering child abuse predator recidivism by aggregating child molesters into a generalized category of —violent assault;
  • Decreasing abuse data for unmarried fathers, step fathers and —live-in boyfriends by aggregating these men with biological, married fathers into —parents and other caretakers“ for incest offenders;
  • Excising data on prostituted and other child sex abuse crimes from DOJ‘s —“Severity of Crime” scales that measure public views of crime severity - implying that child sexual abuse is benign.
  • Wholesale failure to tabulate data on child sex abuse within the child protective services system. 4
The FBI and Intelligence agencies generally have long history of denying child abuse and any other new social deviancy that begins to burst at the seams of society. The Klu Klux Klan, and organised crime were all initially denied until such denials became embarrassing for their obvious untruths. The existence of organised satanic cults is now also officially denied. Yet when official culture enforces denials which fly in the face of copious amounts of evidence to the contrary it usually means that our governments and agencies stand to benefit. Their benefits will always translate to a substantial loss for the ordinary man, woman and child.



Notes 

1 op c.f. Vachss.
2 pp. 19-21., Damned Lies and Statistics: Untangling Numbers from the Media, Politicians, and Activists. By Joel Best, 2001, University of California Press; ISBN: 0520219783.
3 ‘FBI reports biggest violent crime jump in 15 years’ By James Vicini, Reuters, Jun 12, 2006.
4 ‘How the FBI and DOJ Minimize Child Sexual Abuse Reporting’ by Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D. The Institute for Media Education July 2002 An Examination of Relevant Child Abuse Data Suggesting That Reported Decreased Violence to Adults May be a Function of Unreported Increased Violence to Children The Institute for Media Education Interim Report.

Friday, 15 July 2011

Sex, Lies and Society Part III


"Do what thou wilt is the whole of the law"

The pioneering academic sex study centres under scrutiny includes The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality [IASHS] (thereafter called the “Sex Institute”) which offers extensive training and advanced degrees and directed by Penthouse Forum Board member and Kinsey co-author, Dr. Wardell Pomeroy, and Hustler Magazine contributors, Drs. Ted Mcllvena and Erwin Haberlae. The accreditation curricula includes a wide variety of Kinsey inspired material such as The Sex Institute’s degree programme which incorporates: “ ‘advanced graduate’ studies such as: ‘erotic sensate and massage therapy,’ and focuses most of its scholarly training on student viewing, using, even making, ‘erotic’ films….And the “training in the design and implementation of ‘sex education curricula’ for all ages.”
 
So, we have Dr. Pomeroy, co-author and a Kinsey Institute principle, who recommended incest as beneficial to the juvenile to adult readers of Penthouse, Chic, and other pornographic magazines and for whom a belief in “positive incest” allows him to still teach child sexuality.

Furthermore:
These now-accredited Sex Institute experts commonly testify for sex offenders and for businesses which specialize in the production of obscenity and pornography. ‘Experts’ from the American sexual Establishment regularly testify in courts and provide their expertise to legislatures and other public agencies.  For example, in 1980, Wardell Pomeroy testified for a pornographer in Happy Day v. Kentucky, a court case in which Pomeroy admitted under oath to seeking funds from the sex industry to produce his own child pornography. 1
This may go a little way in explaining the present chaos in the European and especially US courts in cases of child abuse and custody cases. One particular form of sexual education in the San Francisco “Sex Institute” and in other universities comes under the formal sounding “Sexual Attitude Restructuring” (SAR) as promulgated by Pomeroy himself and which is achieving a shift in pedagogical attitude and teaching. It incorporates specific images of a both hard and soft-core nature that: “scars the viewer's brain as it short circuits his and her conscience.” This is particularly interesting in light of ponerological aspects of psychopathy that inflict a progressive cognitive dissonance that effectively cuts off the conscience and ability to empathise. The entrainment of SAR is said to erode “emotional refinements by using high resonance images that “psychopharmacologically and neurochemically mold, coarsen and reform viewer's brains, minds and memories.” In effect, it channels sexual energy to a strictly mechanical and animalistic perception of sexuality and in Pomeroy’s words: “The SAR is designed to ‘desensitize,’ that is to disinhibit, all viewers. 2 

This has a particular resonance with the CIA led mind programming operations under the generic term of MK-ULTRA in the 1950s and 60s. Kinsey himself was indirectly associated with some of the main proponents of such mind experimentation. One can’t help but wonder if these are offshoots of that same secret research which became purposely mainstreamed into academia.

Even before Kinsey left his intensive study of wasps and launched into the field of sexuality, he was an ardent New Biologist or Eugenicist who “recommended that a portion of the ‘lower classes’ be sterilized to foster a more robust gene pool.” 3  It becomes more worrisome when eugenics appears so frequently as a prominent principle behind Kinsey’s drive to collect “data” as it does with so many of the academic and intelligentsia of his day. It also becomes somewhat tame in comparison to the company he kept, the mutual friends and acquaintances of which included Dr. Herrmann Muller, a co-worker at IU for several years who had done research at the “Sex Institute” in Berlin, primarily as it was not legal in the United States. It was also at a time when the German, Darwinian Eugenics programs had full Academic approval since before the 1920s, as a definite precursor to Hitler’s Nazi Germany.

In 1943, fellow eugenicist and infamous “scientist” Dr. E. Ewen Cameron became a fellow Rockefeller grantee. In 1973 as president of the American Psychiatric Association, Dr. Cameron was a covert CIA “mind-control” researcher who conducted human experiments outside the borders of the United States, at McGill University in Canada, for CIA director Allen Dulles. Satanist Aleister Crowley, American Nazi George Sylvester Viereck, French paedophile Rene Guyon and occultist film maker Kenneth Anger. The latter director has said:
Kinsey was obsessed with obtaining the Great Beast's (Crowley's) day-to-day sex diaries... To obtain grant monies and maintain the support of the university, Kinsey needed the excuse of research to validate his twenty-four-hours-a-day obsession with sex. However, Prok’s (Kinsey’s nickname) battle cry of ‘Do your best and let other people react as they will’ seemed a variation on Crowley's ‘Do what thou wilt’ maxim. (i.e. "Do what thou wilt is the whole of the law"). 4
Granted, we have no way of knowing the truth of Anger’s claims but the historical saga does not end there. With eugenics, Nazism, fascism and sex-magic topping the Kinsey bill, this already heady brew may account for the suspicions which eventually surrounded the so called father of the “sexual revolution” that contributed to an equally dubious counter-culture. It is far too much of a coincidence to have so many friends and acquaintances involved which advocated a mix that could be summarised as Nazi influenced Satanism.

Kinsey’s personal life, as well as his professional life, clearly exhibited an obsessive curiosity with the mechanics of sex. When you mix a sexual obsessive with the above mentioned friends and acquaintances then it becomes clear that Kinsey’s influence could have contributed to the sexual ponerization of society more than any other single individual. But as we know – no-one acts in isolation. It is true - while shunning overly moralistic principles that favour a black and white simplicity - society is indeed degenerating in our confused and distracted visions of sex.  It is interesting that Kinsey’s research conveniently excluded incest and physical abuse/battery yet focused entirely on the more salacious aspects of deviancy giving them undue credence and effectively normalizing them to the point that all now is acceptable, where normalcy is so often pathological and relationships and communicating is just one new party game of buying and selling.

The Kinsey sex studies reported that: “95 percent of American males had violated sex laws seriously enough to put them in jail, 85 percent had experienced premarital sex, 69 percent had used prostitutes, 45 percent were adulterers, as high as 37 percent had experienced orgasm in a homosexual act, and that 17 percent had had sex with an animal.” As the late journalist Jim Keith mentioned: “In these post-Kinsey days this information is not that shocking, in fact it is almost believable, but in 1948 it fell upon the public like a bombshell.”5

Persons such as Kinsey and his sponsors may have exacerbated and played on the lowest instincts in man and brought them to the surface to play an active part in the erosion of social moderation and for a lassaire-faire mentality to reign. This “bombshell” had consequences, the effects of which are still promoted and justified today. Many of these ex-Kinseyian staff and sexologists are now within the court system pronouncing judgements on who they deem fit and proper to look after children in custody cases.

We see the same play-offs between the Christian-right and the liberal left, the former seeing him as a child molesting monster and the latter as a great pioneer and deliverer from the last throes of Victorian values and sexual Puritanism. In reality, neither is correct. He was very likely used for his talents, his failings and his well placed sexual deviancy to act as one of many key influences in another spoke in the wheel of a Rockefeller-led social engineering programme.

Though it would seem that the most vociferous critics of Kinsey are predominantly right wing, “apple-pie” conservatives, they do have considerable justification for their outrage. Admittedly frothing at the mouth with Christian indignation, it would be extremely foolish to write off their criticisms as mere “judgement day” invective. While it could, at a stretch, be said that Kinsey did provide partially valuable data regarding the sexual mores of Middle America and that he was genuinely interested in such “research” it is highly likely that he used this as a convenient method by which he could satisfy his paedophilic fantasies.

Many sexologists and academics dislike having their beloved godfather of sex toppled from his mantle, but when the evidence is carefully pondered, Kinsey’s own sexual demons become the driving force in his research which may have been fully exploited by those who provided his funding. When one puts the Rockefeller foundation in the driving seat it leaves a decidedly uncomfortable feeling that Kinsey’s detractors are onto something, yet they are shackled by accusations of fundamentalism and the parochial middle-American family values that so often slip into overprotection.

According to biographer James H. Jones, he was “among the most influential Americans of the twentieth century.” If so, then you can be sure he was used for a specific purpose precisely because of those hidden demons. Dr. Kinsey, in 1948, publicly advocated adults engaging in sexual relations with children, making the “scientific” finding that they “derived definite pleasure” from sexual use by adults. Kinsey wrote those children’s screams of pain, their striking and struggling to get away from their “partner” were all supporting evidence of the child subject’s pleasure from sexual contact with an adult “trained observer.” Dr. Reisman, wrote that “While it is clearly established that these above children’s responses were obtained by adult male child sex offenders, the Kinsey group accepts child offender/evidence re: the child victims.”

Knowing that the nature of the sexual predator in our midst is highly adaptive, manipulative and very, very clever, it is not without good reason that this is exactly the kind of niche post that such individuals seek out. Their molestations can then proceed undetected through a variety of ingenious covers. Perhaps Kinsey had his own mandated stamp of approval that allowed him to do as he pleased. A handwritten Kinsey Institute reply reads: “not an offender unless legally charged,” as Kinsey himself had stated, that “one is not a criminal unless one is caught.” Kinsey said in 1940, that “at no time did he allow the question of morality to determine what was scientifically acceptable.”

It seems he was true to his word.


Notes


1  Chapter 7, pp 172-174 (Reisman, 2003)
2 (Chapter 7, pp 172-174 Reisman, 2003) See also pp. 174-175 and the following extract: “In December 1982, George Leonard reported his Sexual Attitude Restructuring (SAR) experience in Esquire magazine. [Esquire: The End of Sex, p. 24]   Noting at least 60,000 people trained in colleges and university by the SAR beginning in the early 1980s, Leonard expects his experience is typical: The sensory overload culminated on Saturday night in a multi-media event called the F—korama ... in the darkness ... images of human beings - and some-times even animals — engaging in every conceivable sexual act, accompanied by wails, squeals, moans, shouts, and the first movement of the Tchaikovsky Violin Concerto.  Some seventeen simultaneous moving pictures ... Over a period of several hours, there came a moment when the four images on the wall were of a gay male couple, a straight couple, a lesbian couple, and a bestial group.  The subjects were nude,..I felt myself becoming disoriented ... was she kissing a man or a woman?  I struggled to force the acts I was watching into their proper boxes ... and now I couldn't remember which was which.  Wasn't I supposed to make these discriminations?  I searched for clues.  There were none.  I began to feel uncomfortable.  Soon I realized that to avoid vertigo and nausea I would have to give up the attempt to discriminate and simply surrender to the experience ... The differences for which lives have been ruined, were not only trivial, but invisible.  By the end ... Nothing was shocking....But nothing was sacred either.  But as I drove home, I began to get a slightly uneasy feeling.  It was almost as if I had been conned ... by my own conditioned response of taking the most liberated position ... whatever my deeper feelings.... love had not been mentioned a single time during the entire weekend.”
3  ‘Sex Experiments of Alfred Kinsey.’ By Jim Keith
4 p.50. Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness by Jim Keith.

5 Ibid. p.49 Keith.



Wednesday, 8 June 2011

Satan's Little Helpers Part VI


The Colonel, the Ionosphere and Alien thoughts


“The unfortunate truth though is that we live in a world where people like you are protected, so there is virtually no chance that the numerous charges made against you will ever be given a fair and just hearing. When faced with such a situation, 'we the people' have no choice but to render our own verdict, after taking into account the full weight of the evidence on both sides. Having undertaken such a review, I have come to the inescapable conclusion that you are guilty as charged, beyond what I would consider to be a reasonable doubt. There is nothing in your rebuttal argument that would lead me to reconsider that verdict.” – David McGowan in correspondence with Michael Aquino: “A Dialogue with the Devil.”


A former stockbroker for Merrill Lynch, former student at The National Defence University; holder of two advanced degrees in Political Science and a highly decorated military man who served in the Green Berets, Lt. Col. Michael Aquino manages to surface in all areas which are the most secretive and therefore one could say, arouse the most suspicion.

 A specialist in Psychological Warfare, he served as Liaison officer in NATO countries. A consulting faculty member of U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, he believes in the “Coming Apocalypse with an annihilation except for a few elect.” Obviously Aquino believes he is one of these “elect.” He worked with Anton LeVey, the creator of the Church of Satan and writer of The Satanic Bible until 1975, (LeVey was associated with Roman Polanski, Manson Family, Son of Sam) until his initiation as a high priest and leader of his own church of the Temple of Set, 43 a Satanic Church with its headquarters in San Francisco. (He stepped down in 1996 and handed over the reins to Don Webb who later handed on the beastly baton to High Priestess Zeena Schreck in September 2002. Zeena, Magister Aaron Besson, Magister Nikolas Schreck, and Magister Michael Kelly all resigned on 8 November 2002 as well as four other Priests. Temple of Set sources have claimed that perhaps sixty of the adepts, initiates and Setian degrees high degree have left the Church over the past several years. Obviously, Set drives a hard bargain).

Though Nazism and Satanism have ostensibly little in common in terms of philosophy the practice and results amount to exactly the same thing. LeVey apparently conducted occult rituals patterned on ceremonies conducted by Nazi leader Heinrich Himmler in his own castle in Germany, once used by Nazi SS for Black Magic ceremonies during the Third Reich. Aquino also performed the rituals “to recreate an order of knighthood for followers of Satan,” a kind of inverted Knights of Camelot, if you will. He then encouraged his followers to study the beliefs of the Nazi terrorist group, The Vehm, the Thule Gessflschaft and the Ahnenerbe, two fanatically right wing Aryan groups that existed before and during Hitler's reign. Aquino’s book list for the Church of Set, includes Mein Kampf, Hitler: The Occult Messiah, and The Occult Roots of Nazism. It would seem reasonable that Aquino had more than a passing interest in Nazism and thus its uses and applications.

One of the crucial pieces of evidence that linked the Colonel to the case in the first place was the parents of one child who had noticed “changes in their daughter’s behavior after placing her in Gary Hambright’s class four or five times in September and October of 1986. The girl, who turned three in October, had begun having nightmares and would wet herself when frightened.”

Eventually they took their daughter to a therapist at Letterman Army Medical Center in February of 1987. Under therapy, the child talked of a man called ‘Mikey’ and another woman, as ‘Shamby’ at the military commissary:

On Aug. 12, 1987, the [parents] Adams-Thompsons were shopping at the PX at the Presidio. Suddenly the girl ran to Larry Adams-Thompson and clutched his leg. He looked up and saw a man whom he knew as Lt Col. Michael Aquino.

‘Yes, that's Mikey,’ the 3-year-old told Adams-Thompson. After being taken outside, the girl added, ‘he’s a bad man and I'm afraid.’ As they were leaving the parking lot, the Adams-Thompsons saw Aquino’s wife, Lilith. Larry asked the child if she knew the woman.
‘Yes, that's Shamby,’ the girl said.
The family went home and called the FBI. 44

Later in the therapy she described their home, black walls, cross over ceiling, bathtub and Satan rituals performed on her as best she could. San Francisco Police raided the apartment of Aquino only to find a description identical to the child’s:

When interviewed by authorities the next day, the girl identified Gary Hambright from a photo lineup and said she had been driven to Mikey and Shamby’s home by Hambright. There, she said, she was abused by Hambright, Mikey and Shamby in a room with black walls. She said that she had been photographed. She said Hambright and Mikey were dressed in women's clothes and Shamby was dressed in man's clothes.

The investigators drove her to Leavenworth Street in San Francisco. The girl was asked to identify any of the houses that she had been to before. While walking past 2430 Leavenworth, the girl identified the house as the one where she met ‘Mikey’ and ‘Shamby.’ It was the Aquino’s house. [...] 45

Knowing the FBI’s agenda for denying Satanism, especially connected to the military, it is no surprise that no action was taken.

Much as been written about Aquino’s involvement and though there is proof of complicity and enough to justify a court case he is protected by the military occult complex. The circumstantial evidence and Aquino’s shadowy history alone do little to limit the “bad taste” one gets when presented with the cases like Presidio or McMartin pre-school.  Rightly or wrongly, the man has become a byword for Satanism, intelligence, mind control, assassinations and all things nefarious.

The uses of the “reverse psychology” ploy or making a person or populace believe one thing while doing another in “plain sight” is second nature to men such as Aquino. The stereotype of the dark lord with bony finger in every power-filled pie would invite suspicion even if were not the case that he had been “investigated” by Army Criminal Investigation Division officers for involvement in paedophile cases; even if he was not the one-time leader of the Temple of Set the most popular Satanic religion in the US and not discounting the fact that Aquino was involved in pioneering work in military psychological operations (“Psy-Ops”) while retaining highest-level security clearances. Perhaps he is simply the authentic personification of all that one should distrust about Establishment America. One Army spokesmen at the Pentagon label said regarding Aquino's military career as “extraordinary” but that he was entitled to his religious beliefs. Concerning his top security clearance, they saw his openness about being a Satanist “made him much less of a security risk than a homosexual or someone with drug or money problems would be.”46 

Despite the his dubious qualifications Aquino carefully refuted the many allegations, perhaps in a manner befitting a black ops operative and sort after military asset. His response to internet allegations can be found at thekonformist.com and David McGowan’s website which proves interesting reading. Aquino raises some valid points concerning the hysteria which sprang up around SRA with manufactured evidence and sensationalist reporting whipped up by Christian fundamentalists. In the Colonel’s words: “A review of my attorney’s district & appeals briefs & orals will glaringly expose what was actually taking place: a court cover-up of blatant Senatorial/SecArmy/CID misconduct - and simultaneous brushing-aside of numerous illegal actions against an Army officer and his wife of a ‘politically incorrect religion.’”

Aquino makes a point of listing the US military citations and awards, suggesting he is a valuable asset and respected pillar of the community. This is hardly proof of anything other than an old boys’ network and placed in the context of David McGowan’s comments regarding the Colonel:

...the failure to prosecute the federal charges could have been due to the fact that, at the time, the U.S. Attorney in San Francisco handling the case was Joseph Russoniello. Russoniello would later be identified by reporter Gary Webb (of the San Jose Mercury News) as a player in the Contra cocaine smuggling operation led by Lt. Col. Oliver North and company, just as witnesses would later identify Lt. Col. Michael Aquino as an operative in the very same sordid affair.47

It may well have been true that Aquino was ironically drawn into a military sex ring which, with his delusions of priestly grandeur may have been beneath what he perceives to be his Setian ebony tower upon which he views us ordinary folk as mere playthings. At the same time, perhaps this would be typical of one that worships individualism to use children as playthings?  Would not the science of self-service demand such acts of knowledge? Would not that be part of the nature of power and Godliness where one can “Do what thou wilt?” Perhaps Michael Aquino is guilty of nothing more than the pushing the limits of flower arranging and needlework in his spare time.

The nature of his work and associations will always cast a literal shadow on his proclamations of innocence in this matter and others like him. Conversely, the fact that Aquino is a member of the Temple Of Set and is a high ranking military official is disturbing enough, but it does not necessarily equate his actions with paedophilia and sexual abuse per se. What it does cause is a “turf war” between Satanists and Christians where the alleged crimes of Aquino and the military apparatus in general become lost in “Satanic rituals” while the real reason for such activities continue to be obscured. One cannot escape the fact that such illusion and perceptual cross-fires are Aquino’s speciality. The principles of Niccoli Machiavelli’s The Prince are the basic tenets of PsyOps, closely related to the Black arts and mind control. Lt. Col. Michael Aquino is a specialist in this area. Whatever the truth of military men like the Colonel, such individuals are extremely common indeed in systems that require domination by rote. They differ only in the strength of their will drawn from their psychopathic or sociopathic tendencies.

Paul Vallely, a one time senior military analyst for FOX News, retired in 1991 from the US Army as Deputy Commanding General, US Army, Pacific. He served 32 years, more than 15 of them in Special Operations, Psychological and Civil-Military Operations. After co-authoring Endgame - Blueprint for Victory for Winning the War on Terror, he wrote a military paper with Aquino in 1980 entitled: From PsyOps to Mindwar: The Psychology of Victory. The book serves to indicate the complexity of double or triple bluff that may be constantly projected onto the public to serve a singular end:

Like the sword Excalibur, we have but to reach out and seize this tool; and it can transform the world for us if we have the courage and the integrity to civilization with it. If we do not accept Excalibur, then we relinquish our ability to inspire foreign cultures with our morality. If they then desire moralities unsatisfactory to us, we have no choice but to fight them on a more brutish level. [...] 48 [Emphasis mine]

MindWar has nothing to do with deception or even with “selected” truth, (and therefore misleading). Rather, it states a whole truth that if it does not now exist, will be forced into existence by the will of the United States, a philosophy that fits evermore neatly into fascist/occultist precepts now dominating the shadow government of the Bush Administration.

Not only is this a typical regurgitation of an American fascist doctrine so popular now with the Neo-Cons and their legion of think-tank advisers it could also be said to fit in rather neatly with the principles of a Satanic-Kabbalistic path where the perceived “Whole truth” is “forced into existence” arrogantly attempting to displace the will of Creation. If we remember that Philosophical Satanism views oneself as the subjective centre of the universe, and strives to elevate the Self over others. A Satanist views him/herself as his or her own god. The LaVeyan Satanist maintains that those who find themselves naturally aligned with Satanism should strive to separate themselves from the herd mentality adopting an “enlightened individualism”; to maintain it as much as possible in order to learn to exploit their naivetĆ© and misguided altruism.

On the Temple of Set website there is an impression of romantic science and freedom fighting for the soul which has its roots in the original LaVey Church of Satan. This Demi-God was was understood to be “an authentic metaphysical presence: a being not evil, but rather independent, assertive, and creative - a true Prince of Darkness after the imagery of Milton, Blake, Baudelaire, and Twain.” If it were just a question of “personal Godhood” and the observation of ethics and responsibility then there would be no distinction to make save the semantics of individual and collective freedom. The distinction between knowledge as a means for self-sucking power and Knowledge as an energy disbursement based around sharing seems to be a key distinction. The Satanist as trickster has been left out of the seemingly pious and humble explanations of practicing Satanists, most of whom are pandering to the dilettante it seems.

Either way, on the lower tiers of such nonsense, Aquino and his ilk will no doubt attract their naĆÆve followers charmed by the flowery words and the issuing forth of earnest intentions. They are the “Chosen Ones” and are part of the pyramid of diminishing returns; a monolithic culture of predation that requires more and more amounts of energy in order to sustain itself. Deception is the primary mode of acquiring such energy.  Embroider the concepts with suitable romance and chemistry of the cool and the pied piper wins every time. In summary, “the world inside the devil” is concerned with the occult maxim of “Will to Power.” It is concerned with the “Whole Truth” which must be entirely subjective tied as it is to one’s own individualistic intent and will – which is a God in Diapers. Therefore, for those who are by nature, self-seeking adherents to the exclusivity of personal needs, as self-Godhood, the results will be strictly material in every sense of the word, which is why for the Satanist their God is the Physical/material world or entropy. One’s psychic power will be impressive as long as one relishes the kundalini-chemicals and the biology to sense it. One this expires, one can imagine that the Faustian bargain will want some recompense. The worshipping of personal power will then give you the same – a primal and ultimate absorption into the Dark matter – sucked into its maw. Colonel Aquino is highly likely a figure of fun and as much a puppet as Bush when one ascends the pyramid behind the immediately accessible dross of outer appearances.

In reality, whether on the periphery in the early stages, it is conceivable that such satanic outposts are openings to the honeycomb networks of further recruits to be controlled in a variety of ways once they have reached a suitable degree. This “brutish level” which Aquino and Vallely speak of incorporates all manner of propaganda operations which are spawned from a shadow government obsession with mind control experiments so enamoured of the CIA and NSA. Propaganda is never enough. Controlling the mind, body and soul of the populace is the goal.

Let us not forget that: “By early 1969, teams within the CIA were running a number of bizarre experiments in mind control under the name Operation Often. In addition to the normal assortment of chemists, biologists, and conventional scientists, the operation employed psychics and experts in demonology.”49 Indeed, Operation Often had its roots in the 1950 and 60s  mind control experiments of Dr. E. Cameron and the LSD experiments of Sidney Gottelieb mentioned previously. The evolution of extremes meant that the CIA behaviorists studied the arcana of the occult underground in the hope of utilising its principles.50 Returning to MindWar the following extract is equally pertinent:

For the mind to believe in its own decisions, it must feel that it made those decisions without coercion. Coercive measures used by the operative, consequently, must not be detectable by ordinary means. There is no need to resort to mind-weakening drugs such as those explored by the CIA; in fact the exposure of a single such method would do unacceptable damage to MindWar’s reputation for truth. Existing PSYOP identifies purely-sociological factors which suggest appropriate idioms for messages. Doctrine in this area is highly developed, and the task is basically one of assembling and maintaining individuals and teams with enough expertise and experience to apply the doctrine effectively. This, however, is only the sociological dimension of target receptiveness measures. There are some purely natural conditions under which minds may become more or less receptive to ideas, and MindWar should take full advantage of such phenomena as atmospheric electromagnetic activity, air ionization, and extremely low frequency waves. [Emphasis mine] 51
Advocates of a world-wide conspiracy of Satanic Ritual Abuse believe that the reason that cases have not resulted in prosecution is due to the accused having the protection of the courts and the government. This is undoubtedly true in many  cases. However, as we have discovered the divide and rule precept of the Pathocracy keeps all parties blind. 

As Aquino was busy clearing “his good name” however unconvincingly, he rightly mentioned a book called Michelle Remembers which started the whole hysteria of “satanic panic.” Countless accusations and allegations led to the imprisonment of the innocent, while giving cover to the guilty. It was in fact, a work of fiction that was presented as fact and was later shown to be a hoax.52

Renowned author Laura Knight-Jadczyk offers up a controversial hypothesis in relation to the so-called grey alien abduction 53 and SRA, both of which arrived on the scene at the same time. Allegations of SRA were whipped up into a frenzy of religious persecution and “‘moral entrepreneurs’ both fed the fires of prosecution and earned a good living from it.”  She asks: “If there are thousands of baseless accusations of SRA and thousands upon thousands of cases of unverifiable alien abductions, from where do they originate?”54

Knight-Jadczyk reiterates the puzzle that children would not make up stories of such bizarre acts and abuse which are often so explicit and beyond the knowledge of children of preschool age. Stories are also taken at face value by prosecutors, therapists, police officers and parents. Sometimes they are quite correct but frequently they are wrong. While establishing that many ufology and New Age operatives are often part of CoIntelpro programmes designed to hoodwink the populace into dead-end alley ways of awareness, she mentions certain figures coming together at the same juncture which are suggestive of intelligence manoeuvres designed to manipulate the public mind. Knight-Jadczyk then quotes the following from political historian Richard M. Dolan:
By the early 1970s, there were already means available to alter the moods of unsuspecting persons. A pocket-sized transmitter generating electromagnetic energy at less than 100 milli-watts could do the job. This is no pie-in-the-sky theory. In 1972, Dr. Gordon J.F. McDonald testified before the House Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment on the issue of electromagnetic weapons used for mind control and mental disruption. He stated:
[T]he basic notion was to create, between the electrically charged ionosphere in the higher part of the atmosphere and conducting layers of the surface of the Earth, this neutral cavity, to create waves, electrical waves that would be tuned to the brain waves. ...About ten cycles per second. ...You can produce changes in behavioral patterns or in responses.
The following year, Dr. Joseph C. Sharp, at Walter Reed Hospital, while in a soundproof room, was able to hear spoken words broadcast by ‘pulsed microwave audiogram.’ These words were broadcast to him without any implanted electronic translation device. Rather, they reached him by direct transmission to the brain.
Consider the above ‘electrically charged ionosphere in the higher part of the atmosphere’ in terms of ‘chemtrails.’ 55 [Emphasis mine]
Aquino’s prescient statement that psychological operations: “… should take full advantage of such phenomena as atmospheric electromagnetic activity, air ionization, and extremely low frequency waves,” then takes on a richer meaning. This posits the idea that a mass mind control program may be in operation where Satanic Ritual Abuse and Alien abduction scenarios are beamed into our very heads.  Unlikely as that may seem to some, the technology to manipulate our collective minds is already in operation in the corporate sector. All commercial patents finding their way to the public arena are many years, possibly several decades behind military applications. New innovations away from the media and public scrutiny will be far in advance of anything available in the market place and they will not be designed for benevolent applications – of that we can be certain.  For instance:

…the NSA’s electronic surveillance system can simultaneously follow and handle millions of people. Each of us has a unique bioelectrical resonance frequency in the brain, just like we have unique fingerprints. With electro-magnetic frequency (EMF) brain stimulation fully coded, pulsating electromagnetic signals can be sent to the brain, causing the desired voice and visual effects to be experienced by the target. This is a form of electronic warfare. U.S. astronauts were implanted before they were sent into space so their thoughts could be followed and all their emotions could be registered 24hrs a day. 56
We can imagine how the advances may manifest in our present era of mass mind control. Generating enormous amounts of fear is a major component of this control, it is the realm of the boogie man: the “War on Terror,” an epidemic of satanic abuse and alien abductions, paedophile predators; climate change; religious Jihad and Judgement Day:  all filtered through a compliant media that delivers the required manipulation of the masses. It does not mean that there is no truth to the accusations and that they do not take place - all the above examples have some aspect of a core truth. Perhaps it is more about the way in which these facts and hypotheses are presented, riding as they are atop the runaway trains of personal beliefs and assumptions; that the frequency, context and root cause for such horrors may be very different than we think. Qui bono is always operating.

A key role in this mass misunderstanding is the stimulated fight between occultism and Religious fundamentalism. The hysteria of right wing religious groups and politicians attempting to root out instances of Satanism only provide further obfuscation. What are beyond dispute are the theological roots and present day activities of this American fundamentalism are ironically close to a form of Satanism in itself. Waiting in the wings behind neo-con zealots and Christian fundies, the psychopathic war mongers are the occultists deep in the pit of politics, or as occult writer Peter Levenda stated: “a peculiar breed of dark magician…who are little more than frustrated SS officers yearning for the day when a magically oriented totalitarianism regime takes the field once more and settles the world’s problems by the oldest and simplest expedient available, the two step formula of exclusion and annihilation.” 57

 A recent article from Online Journal’s contributing editor Wayne Marsden reminded us of a child pornography ring in the 1980s that extended from Oregon to the San Francisco Bay area and to Chicago and Washington, DC. This involved many officers of the U.S. Navy, yet another breach in a sub-network which the author believes was covered up by one John Lehman, the then Secretary of the Navy who engaged in similar cover-ups and various sexual misdemeanours and crimes within the Navy itself. Marsden has since had to vacate his US home due to death threats.58

The Navy has an odd history of pathogenic infiltration. The heady days of MK-ULTRA permeated the US military and in particular naval intelligence. L.Ron Hubbard and his rocket scientist friend Jack Parsons helped to subvert still further the military rituals of Navy personnel. Both men were involved in Aleister Crowley’s Black Magick society Ordo Templis Orientis (OTO) which was attracting considerable converts from government, military and corporate sectors of society. Hubbard was said to have been drafted in by the Office of Navel Intelligence (ONI) to break up a satanic cult that was spreading among top scientists while Parsons was said to be have been the primary instigator of the spread of occultism. (It is highly dubious that Hubbard was given the job of foiling such a ring, should that have been possible. It was more likely that he was part of it, given his background). By 1946, with the inspiration of Crowley’s integration of various sets of Magick, Hubbard and Parsons were engaging in their own magickal studies including an extended set of sex magick rituals called the “Babylon Working,” intended to summon a goddess or “moonchild.”

Parsons came to immerse himself in Crowleyian rituals believing he was the Anti-Christ only to die in a suspicious accident a year later. Meantime, Hubbard was about to write Dianetics which would swiftly lead onto his cult of Scientology, itself rooted in Black Magick as a consequence of Hubbard’s fascination with The Book of Law and Thelmic rituals. After Crowley’s unceremonious death in 1947, the role of “the Beast” was wide open. According to Ron De Wolf, Hubbard’s son, his father took it upon himself to fully embrace the concept of Satan, not as a form of worship but to understand that he himself was one with Satan. This realisation came from: “…the creation of what they call embryo implants—of getting a demonic spirit to inhabit the body of a foetus. This would come about as a result of black-magic rituals, which included the use of hypnosis, drugs, and other dangerous and destructive practices. One of the important things was to destroy the evidence if you failed at this Immaculate Conception. That’s how my father became obsessed with abortions.”59

It seems Hubbard, Parsons and others were happily riding high on the infusion of narcotics and magickal practices that were busy doing the rounds on the intelligences circuits. Hubbard did not get his brain-washing techniques from anywhere else. He used the workings of occult rituals and nuggets of mind control secrets going on at the time to launch his career from a failed science-fiction writer to a global multi-million dollar icon and the Dianetics-led religion of Scientology.60


Notes

43 “Set was depicted most commonly as a human form with some sort of animal head, featuring a long, curved snout and upright ears. He was a god that went through periods of extreme popularity and unpopularity in Egypt, depending on the beliefs of the prevailing ruling class. At times Set was widely worshipped as a god representing individual consciousness, as well as the darker forces of nature (thunder, deserts, etc.). During other periods Set was looked at as being a god of evil, violence, and hostility. In some Egyptian myths, Set was born by violently bursting out of the side of his mother's womb, killed his brother Osiris, and was in the business of stealing dead people's souls in the underworld.” (Metareligion.com) [Not exactly a glowing endorsement for the US Army].
44  ‘Army of the Night:  Child Abuse at the Presidio, the Parents’ Agony, the Army’s Cover-Up, The Prosecution’s Failure By Linda Goldston, San Jose Mercury News, July 24, 1988.
45   Ibid.
46   Ibid.
47   Programmed to Kill p. 42; (McGowan, 2001).
48   p. 7 introduction; From PsyOps to Mindwar: The Psychology of Victory by Colonel Paul E. Valley and Major Michael A. Aquino (1980) 
49   UFOs and the National Security State p. 361 (Dolan, 2002)
50  Even as early as 1964 the use of Occult rituals and themes was an accepted part of Psychological warfare and planning. Africa was a continent that was not only exploited for its resources and people but “Witchcraft, Sorcery, Magic and Other Psychological Phenomena” was one study underwritten by the same CIA front, the (MKULTRA) Human Ecology Fund. This gathered valuable data for the Bureau of Social Science Research (BSSR) the source of countless studies of Psychological Warfare on Eastern European countries.  The Belgian administration in the Congo was one beneficiary of such studies allowing the power stuggle within the Republic to side with a pro-US government.51  p.347 Colonel Paul E. Valley and Major Michael A. Aquino (1980) ‘Michelle Remembers: the Debunking of a Myth’ by Denna Allen and Janet Midwinter, The Mail on Sunday, Spetember 30, 1990; and from the Pagan Protection Centre an article by Kerr Cuhulain ‘Michelle Remembers’excerpt from reader comments, on the online bookstore Amazon.com: “I am speaking as a former ‘ritual abuse survivor’ who has now disavowed all of my ‘repressed memories’. This book is dangerous. And, I completely disagree with everyone who says ‘doesn't matter if it's fact or fiction’? Are you nuts?? People have had their lives ruined over allegations like this. This book played a major part in my ‘memories’. My advice is that ‘ritual abuse survivors’ need to find decent therapists.’”
53  “The Greys (or Grays, also known as Roswell Blue-Greys, Zetas or Reticulians after the ζ Reticuli star system) are the type of alleged intelligent extraterrestrial life that appears most commonly in modern UFO conspiracy theories and other UFO-related paranormal phenomena, especially the alien abduction phenomenon. Greys have largely replaced "little green men" as the stereotypical extraterrestrial of popular culture.” - Wikipedia online encyclopaedia at wikipedia.org. 

54  ‘CoIntelpro is at work in the New Age’ By Laura Knight-Jadczyk , June 12, 2003. cassiopaea.org.
55  p. 382.(Dolan, 2002).
56 […] “When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is 50 micromillometers) is placed into optical nerve of the eye, it draws neuroimpulses from the brain that embody the experiences, smells, sights and voice of the implanted person. Once transferred and stored in a computer, these neuroimpulses can be projected back to the person’s brain via the microchip to be re-experienced. Using a RMS, a land-based computer operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to the nervous system, affecting the target's performance. With RMS, healthy persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear voices in their heads.
Every thought, reaction, hearing and visual observation causes a certain neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and its electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into thoughts, pictures and voices. Electromagnetic stimulation can therefore change a person's brainwaves and affect muscular activity, causing painful muscular cramps experienced as torture.” – from ‘Microchip Implants, Mindcontrol, and Cybernetics’ by Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland, SPEKULA, 3rd Quarter,October 23, 1999.

57   p.343; Unholy Alliance by Peter Levenda, published by Continuum (2006).
58   ‘Gannongate threatens to expose a huge GOP pedophile and male prostitution ring’ By Wayne Madsen, Online Journal, February 2005.
59  Penthouse Interview With Ron De Wolf, L. Ron Hubbard Jr. - L. Ron Hubbard Jr. Penthouse, June 1983. [See also Sinister Forces – A grimoire of American Political, Witchcraft By Peter Levenda (2006)].
60 The Church of Scientology has offered a successful mix of spirituality partnered with effective psychological techniques to improve ones life and well being. Equally, it has attracted a huge number of critics as well as many Hollywood celebrity supporters, the most vocal of which is the actor Tom Cruise. Accusations of corruption, intimidation, brainwashing, exploitation and cult-like activities have all been levelled at the organisation. They have also gained a reputation for aggressively pursuing their detractors with mafia-style intensity as many critics have discovered.



  Updated version of the series: http://infrakshun.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/satans-little-helpers-i/


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...