Brandon Smith
“From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl
Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg
(Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy
for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society
on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and
impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern
writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part
in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of
every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last
this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the
great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by
the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed
masters of that enormous empire.”
The concept of conspiracy frightens some people, so much so that they
are willing to overlook any and all evidence that world events are for
the most part directed, rather than chaotic and coincidental. For those
who are uneducated and unaware, explanations for the terrible tides of
politics and war generally revolve around a false understanding of
Occam’s razor. They argue that the theory states that the “simplest
explanation” is usually the correct one for any particular problem or
crisis. But Occam’s razor actually states that the simplest explanation according to the evidence at hand
is usually the correct answer for any given problem. That is to say,
the simplest explanation must conform to the evidence, or it is likely
not correct.
Unfortunately, “skeptics” of directed conspiracy often turn a blind
eye to evidence that is contrary to their simple explanations, while
arguing that simplification is its own vindication. In other words, they
don’t feel the need to defend their simplistic world view because, in
their minds, simplicity stands on its own as self-evident. There was a
time when men believed that the planets revolved around each other
because they were tied together by long glass strings, and this was
evident to them because it was the simplest explanation they could come
up with. The thinking of skeptics of the New World Order and concerted
globalization is much like this.
The most common argument they tend to exploit is that the world is
far too “chaotic” and that if the elites are actually seeking a fully
centralized one-world system, they are “failing miserably” because so
many cultures are so clearly divided. For anyone who holds this argument
as logical or practical, first I would suggest they look beyond the
surface of the various conflicts at the similarities between these so
called “enemies.”
For example, what about the United States versus Russia? These two
nations have a long history of opposing ideologies and have come close
to war time and time again. Certainly, average Americans see themselves
as individualists and Russians as socialist or communist. Average
Russians see Americans as capitalist imperialists and see themselves as
humanists. But what about their respective governments? What about their
respective financiers and oligarchs? Do they really see each other as
enemies?
If that were so, then why did American Wall Street tycoons and the U.S. military aid the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917?
A false paradigm was created when internationalists supported the
Bolshevik Revolution and allowed Russia to become a communist-held
country. The eventual Cold War that resulted created the rationale used
by the military-industrial complex to build a massive standing army
(which is not part of the U.S. Constitution), an army which could then
be sent around the world to subdue various nations and even possibly be
used to oppress the American people.
Even today, the false East/West paradigm continues, with America
painted as the bumbling villain and Russia painted as the stalwart and
reasonable objector. Yet Russia’s top government officials and our top
government officials work closely with and answer to the same
international financiers and elites, like the International Monetary
Fund and the Bank of International Settlements, as I outlined in great
detail in False East/West Paradigm Hides The Rise Of Global Currency and Russia Is Dominated By Global Banks, Too.
Even closer to current events, the U.S. has now entered into military
operations against ISIS insurgents moving rapidly through Iraq’s
northern regions toward Baghdad. However, if ISIS is the enemy, why did the U.S. and our ally, Saudi Arabia, support and train ISIS agents in Syria as well as Iraq?
Is it just irony that our government helped birth ISIS and now the
White House is at war with the group? Or is it possible that maybe, just
maybe, a greater plan is afoot?
As the sinister Rahm Emanuel famously said: “You never
want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an
opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”
Read more
