Comment: Not a surprise, even though so many were laughed at (myself included) in the face of Obama adoration when it was said that there was no way that US forces will ever leave with so many drugs, oil and mineral resources for the taking. Well, it's running true to form.
Presence it required to: "... maintain Afghanistan’s security and to guarantee foreign aid money is not being exploited."
Suuuuure.
-----------------
ICH
Afghanistan may not be seeing a full withdrawal of US troops soon, as many had expected. A newly obtained US-Afghanistan security agreement draft suggests that US forces will stay for much longer than originally expected, possibly indefinitely. The draft includes an agreement for US military outposts and bases to remain in Afghanistan through 2024. It also shows plans to fund and train a great number of Afghan security forces.
Presence it required to: "... maintain Afghanistan’s security and to guarantee foreign aid money is not being exploited."
Suuuuure.
-----------------
ICH
Afghanistan may not be seeing a full withdrawal of US troops soon, as many had expected. A newly obtained US-Afghanistan security agreement draft suggests that US forces will stay for much longer than originally expected, possibly indefinitely. The draft includes an agreement for US military outposts and bases to remain in Afghanistan through 2024. It also shows plans to fund and train a great number of Afghan security forces.
The
security agreement draft was obtained by NBC News, as
they reported Tuesday. The
unsigned 25-page document is dated to July 25, 2013 and
appears to be a working draft. Titled the “Security and Defense
Cooperation Agreement Between The United States of American and
the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan,” its details range from
being very specific to rather unclear.
The draft
is set for review and discussion between some 2,500 officials,
academics, and village representatives in Kabul this week. While
the panel, known as Loya Jirga, does not have authority to make
an agreement, Afghanistan’s president Hamid Karzai says he will
not sign the treaty without their approval.
News of
this security agreement draft comes on the heels of statements
made recently by Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Army General
Martin Dempsey, Bloomberg reports. On Monday he said
that
while a “ubiquitous presence of US military force” is not
necessary in Afghanistan post-2014, the country “can’t live
without any.” Dempsey says a US and NATO presence will be needed
to maintain Afghanistan’s security and to guarantee foreign aid
money is not being exploited.
The high
ranking military official’s remarks back up indications that the
Afghan security agreement draft seeks to allow US troops to
remain in country indefinitely. NATO has already said that
around 8,000 to 12,000 troops could stay in Afghanistan after
2014, not including security guards or counterterrorism forces.
The newly
leaked treaty draft, as it is written, would go into effect in
2015, after the end of the current mission in Afghanistan. It
also says the deal would be in effect through 2024 “and beyond.”
While there have been concerns over several details in the
draft, NBC News says an update circulated among
Pentagon staff and Congress on Monday addresses these issues.
Signing of
the the Afghanistan security agreement will likely not happen
for another two months, as it must be approved by the Afghan
parliament and president.
This article was originally published at
The Inquisitr
No comments:
Post a Comment