Comment: Personally, I think Russell Brand is sincere. He's funny and articulate and has a passionate message to impart. However, in the scheme of things he's small fry. So, what is going on here? Why have the BBC and other media outlets given him so much air-time?
Celebrities have been used by the Establishment to test the water of the public's reaction to certain ideas for decades. They are useful tools since they are 99.9% unaware that they are being used. They're even more clueless than politicians which is saying something. They are often passionate, narcissistic artists who want to be loved and needed and are more than willing to be given a "mission" and sent on an errand by someone who has whispered the relevant message in their ear...
It is highly likely that Brand is one of these. His talk of socialism and centralisation should be enough to see that he hasn't a clue about the structure and results of that revolution he so earnestly desires. Marxism has been a darling of the social engineers from the heart of the Frankfurt School in the 1930s to the Fabians and on to common purpose in the UK and the capitalist-collectivist thinking of the Anglo-American elite of today. Whether it is socialism or capitalism it's all the same to them. Whatever works to keep control. Once again, stoking up the revolution meme is something the Establishment wants as it will give them a chance to go to phase 2 in cracking down on dissent and introducing the next regime of "protections" for loyal subjects.
However...
With all that in mind, it doesn't mean that just because Brand is selling "a brand" as Tom Secker mentions, and may have been programmed with suitable information by his Rothschild handlers, wound up like a clockwork device and set out to woo the public, that he cannot ignite something positive and true in the public - AGAINST the objectives of his masters.
I have seen the reaction to Brand's interviews by many people who are not well versed in the mechanics of propaganda and PSYOPS as something really quite positive. It has promoted discussion, re-evaluation and soul-searching. Timing is everything here and we live in an age of unpredictability - something which the Elite despise because they cannot control it. As Secker states in his interview he is not a good role model. But I think there have been many messengers of truth (conscious and unconscious) from some very unlikely paths who nonetheless contributed to a rise in collective awareness. To be fair, Brand has repeatedly stated that it is not about him and that there are people with alternatives and visions far more qualified to discuss. He makes a logical point that he is taking the chance to exploit his position and point out the obvious.
Why not? Whoever has put him up to it (if indeed they have) Truth is truth. That does not mean it is not important to know the agenda. But what is more important is what you do with the information imparted.
Of course, the fact that he has been given air-time to do that suggests that yes, there is an agenda there in the background. But the question is, has it tapped into a feeling far more powerful than anyone can imagine? Will it backfire? Time will tell. Brand will fade and people will keep hold of that inspiration and energy in order to change their thoughts and thus their actions.
It may just be a time where all kinds of possibilities can emerge.
Regardless, Tom Secker gives a pretty good overview of the recent Russell Brand phenomena:
------------
spyculture.com
"Following comic and actor Russell Brand’s recent emergence as a political celebrity I dissect his Newsnight interview and the reaction to it. I look at the valid criticisms being made of Brand’s interview and the social media phenomena swirling up around it before emphasising the few valuable, positive aspects of what he said. I finish up with a shortlist of lessons to be learned from the debacle, including the abandoning of political messiahs and the affirmation of the value and importance of real, ordinary people taking action themselves."
Celebrities have been used by the Establishment to test the water of the public's reaction to certain ideas for decades. They are useful tools since they are 99.9% unaware that they are being used. They're even more clueless than politicians which is saying something. They are often passionate, narcissistic artists who want to be loved and needed and are more than willing to be given a "mission" and sent on an errand by someone who has whispered the relevant message in their ear...
It is highly likely that Brand is one of these. His talk of socialism and centralisation should be enough to see that he hasn't a clue about the structure and results of that revolution he so earnestly desires. Marxism has been a darling of the social engineers from the heart of the Frankfurt School in the 1930s to the Fabians and on to common purpose in the UK and the capitalist-collectivist thinking of the Anglo-American elite of today. Whether it is socialism or capitalism it's all the same to them. Whatever works to keep control. Once again, stoking up the revolution meme is something the Establishment wants as it will give them a chance to go to phase 2 in cracking down on dissent and introducing the next regime of "protections" for loyal subjects.
However...
With all that in mind, it doesn't mean that just because Brand is selling "a brand" as Tom Secker mentions, and may have been programmed with suitable information by his Rothschild handlers, wound up like a clockwork device and set out to woo the public, that he cannot ignite something positive and true in the public - AGAINST the objectives of his masters.
I have seen the reaction to Brand's interviews by many people who are not well versed in the mechanics of propaganda and PSYOPS as something really quite positive. It has promoted discussion, re-evaluation and soul-searching. Timing is everything here and we live in an age of unpredictability - something which the Elite despise because they cannot control it. As Secker states in his interview he is not a good role model. But I think there have been many messengers of truth (conscious and unconscious) from some very unlikely paths who nonetheless contributed to a rise in collective awareness. To be fair, Brand has repeatedly stated that it is not about him and that there are people with alternatives and visions far more qualified to discuss. He makes a logical point that he is taking the chance to exploit his position and point out the obvious.
Why not? Whoever has put him up to it (if indeed they have) Truth is truth. That does not mean it is not important to know the agenda. But what is more important is what you do with the information imparted.
Of course, the fact that he has been given air-time to do that suggests that yes, there is an agenda there in the background. But the question is, has it tapped into a feeling far more powerful than anyone can imagine? Will it backfire? Time will tell. Brand will fade and people will keep hold of that inspiration and energy in order to change their thoughts and thus their actions.
It may just be a time where all kinds of possibilities can emerge.
Regardless, Tom Secker gives a pretty good overview of the recent Russell Brand phenomena:
------------
spyculture.com
"Following comic and actor Russell Brand’s recent emergence as a political celebrity I dissect his Newsnight interview and the reaction to it. I look at the valid criticisms being made of Brand’s interview and the social media phenomena swirling up around it before emphasising the few valuable, positive aspects of what he said. I finish up with a shortlist of lessons to be learned from the debacle, including the abandoning of political messiahs and the affirmation of the value and importance of real, ordinary people taking action themselves."
No comments:
Post a Comment