In his landmark post-colonial work Culture and Imperialism, the world renowned public intellectual and critical theorist Edward Said wrote, “Just
as none of us is outside or beyond geography, none of us is completely
free from the struggle over geography. That struggle is complex and
interesting because it is not only about soldiers and cannons but also
about ideas, about forms, about images and imaginings.”
Here, Said is highlighting a fundamental aspect of the hegemony of the Western imperial system in the late 20th and early 21st
Centuries: the need for dominance over the physical, political, and
discursive space. Specifically, Said argued correctly that contemporary
imperialism seeks far more than simply control over land and resources –
it seeks a monopoly on information, ideology, and language.
Nowhere is this fact more apparent than
in what used to be considered the United States’ imperial backyard:
Latin America. The untimely death of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez,
the great unifier of Latin America in the 21st Century, did
little to stem the tide of independence from US political and economic
institutions. In fact, it seems that the independent-minded leaders of
Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Nicaragua, and other countries in the
region, have followed Chavez’s lead in retaking control over their
nations’ futures. From the expulsion of US military and intelligence
forces, to Latin American governments’ taking on powerful multinational
corporations, indications that the region is more independent than ever
before are now unmistakable.
And so, it is against this backdrop that
Washington attempts to reassert its control either directly through its
military, or indirectly through destabilizations using a vast array of
weapons of “soft power.” It is precisely this “soft power” – the ability
to influence events using non-military, non-coercive means – that is at
the forefront of the US strategy to maintain hegemony in Latin America.
Taken in tandem, Washington’s cocktail of hard and soft power is at the
root of the US’s Latin American policy today.
No comments:
Post a Comment