Thierry Messyan
VoltaireNet.org
This policy, known as « zero problem », began sucessfully at
first.Ankara no longer feared Damascus and its support for the PKK, and
also asked Syria for help in negotiating an exit. In October 2006, the
Kurdish party declared a unilateral truce and began negotiations with
the Erdoğan government. In May 2008, Ankara organised indirect
negotiations between Damascus and Tel-Aviv, the first talks since Ehud
Barack’s rejection of the Bill Clinton / Hafez el-Assad plan. But
President Bachar el-Assad withdrew from the discussions after Israël
attacked Gaza in December 2009.
Realising that because of the Palestinian conflict, it was impossible to maintain good relations with all the states in the region, Ankara chose to support the Palestinians against Israël. This was the period of the Davos and Freedom Flotilla episodes. Backed by vast popular support in the Muslim world, Ankara approached Teheran and accepted, in November 2010, to participate in a Turkey-Iran-Iraq-Syria common market. Visas were repealed ; the rights of the Customs were considerably reduced ; a consortium was created to manage the oil and gas pipe-lines ; an authority was created to enable the management of water ressources. The overall structure looked so inviting that Lebanon and Jordan presented their candidacy. Sustainable peace seemed possible for the Levant.
When, in 2011, the United Kingdom and France launched a double war against Libya and Syria, at the request and under the control of the United States, Turkey quite logically opposed it. These wars, launched on the pretext of protecting the populations, were far too evidently neo-colonial strategies. Besides, they damaged Turkish interests, since Libya was one of its main economic partners and Syria had become one by way of the new regional common market.
That’s when everything collapsed…
Read more
VoltaireNet.org
When they took power in Ankara in 2003, the Islamist
party AKP modified Turkey’s strategic priorities. Rather than using
reports on the post-« Desert Storm » balance of power, Recep Tayyip
Erdoğan harboured the ambition of freeing his country from the isolation
it has known since the end of the Ottoman Empire. Based on analyses
provided by his advisor, Professor Ahmet Davutoğlu, he advocated solving
century-old problems with Turkey’s neighbours, and becoming
progressively the inevitable regional mediator. In order to do so,
Turkey had to become a political model and build relations with his Arab
partners, without losing its alliance with Israël.
Realising that because of the Palestinian conflict, it was impossible to maintain good relations with all the states in the region, Ankara chose to support the Palestinians against Israël. This was the period of the Davos and Freedom Flotilla episodes. Backed by vast popular support in the Muslim world, Ankara approached Teheran and accepted, in November 2010, to participate in a Turkey-Iran-Iraq-Syria common market. Visas were repealed ; the rights of the Customs were considerably reduced ; a consortium was created to manage the oil and gas pipe-lines ; an authority was created to enable the management of water ressources. The overall structure looked so inviting that Lebanon and Jordan presented their candidacy. Sustainable peace seemed possible for the Levant.
When, in 2011, the United Kingdom and France launched a double war against Libya and Syria, at the request and under the control of the United States, Turkey quite logically opposed it. These wars, launched on the pretext of protecting the populations, were far too evidently neo-colonial strategies. Besides, they damaged Turkish interests, since Libya was one of its main economic partners and Syria had become one by way of the new regional common market.
That’s when everything collapsed…
Read more
No comments:
Post a Comment