Accuser of Julian Assange and possibly CIA-connected, Anna Ardin
Craig Murray
craigmurray.org.uk
via Sott.net
The mainstream media have ensured very few people know the detail of the "case" against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN Working Group ruled that Assange ought never to have been arrested in the UK in the first place because there is no case, and no genuine investigation. Read this and you will know why.
The other thing not widely understood is there is NO JURY in a rape trial in Sweden and it is a SECRET TRIAL. All of the evidence, all of the witnesses, are heard in secret. No public, no jury, no media. The only public part is the charging and the verdict. There is a judge and two advisers directly appointed by political parties. So you never would get to understand how plainly the case is a stitch-up. Unless you read this.
There are so many inconsistencies in Anna Ardin's accusation of sexual assault against Julian Assange. But the key question which leaps out at me - and which strangely I have not seen asked anywhere else - is this:
Why did Anna Ardin not warn Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had sex with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become known in the Swedish group around Assange for the shocking pink cashmere sweater she had worn in the front row of Assange's press conference. Anna Ardin knew Assange was planning to have sex with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a friend who was looking for Assange:
"He's not here. He's planned to have sex with the cashmere girl every evening, but not made it. Maybe he finally found time yesterday?"Yet Ardin later testified that just three days earlier, on 13 August, she had been sexually assaulted by Assange; an assault so serious she was willing to try (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange's entire life. She was also to state that this assault involved enforced unprotected sex and she was concerned about HIV.
If Ardin really believed that on 13 August Assange had forced unprotected sex on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life? And why was Ardin discussing with Assange his desire for sex with Wilen, and texting about it to friends, with no evident disapproval or discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen's contact details and indeed had organised her registration for the press conference. She could have warned her. But she didn't.
Let us fit that into a very brief survey of the whole Ardin/Assange relationship.
Read more
See also: Revealed: Assange ‘rape’ accuser linked to notorious CIA operative
1 comment:
You are raising an important point, but there are many other facts that contradict the women's claims...
Unfortunately, the Western media acts as a unified propaganda arm for the USA.
Even if we ignore Assange's denials, and only take the two women's testimonies and actions, I would conclude that there was no rape, but in the eyes of most people in the West, Assange is a "rapist".
I live in Sweden and in conversations with two Swedish women I expressed my opinion that Assange was a victim of political persecution. You cannot imagine the reactions! These are intelligent and tolerant women, but they got furious when I expressed what I thought was a reasonable suspicion on the case. For them he is a rapist. I am sure they don't know any of the details of the case, as I do. They only know the headlines, and being accused by two women is enough for them... nothing else matters. There is no "innocent until proven guilty"... Everything he did becomes irrelevant. It does not matter if he exposed crimes and if USA tries to get him for that. If the governments of 4 countries conspired against a possibly innocent man...
It is amazing how effectively the media can destroy a person nowadays!
Post a Comment