Search This Blog
Showing posts with label Dmitry Orlov. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dmitry Orlov. Show all posts
Sunday, 24 July 2016
Dmitry Orlov Interviewed on Keiser Report Summer Solutions Series
Labels:
Community,
Dmitry Orlov,
Economics
Thursday, 28 November 2013
Closing the 'Collapse Gap': the USSR was better prepared for collapse than the US PART II
Slide [15] The Soviet agricultural sector was
notoriously inefficient. Many people grew and gathered their own food even in
relatively prosperous times. There were food warehouses in every city, stocked
according to a government allocation scheme. There were very few restaurants,
and most families cooked and ate at home. Shopping was rather labor-intensive,
and involved carrying heavy loads. Sometimes it resembled hunting – stalking
that elusive piece of meat lurking behind some store counter. So the people
were well-prepared for what came next.
In the United States, most people get their food
from a supermarket, which is supplied from far away using refrigerated diesel
trucks. Many people don't even bother to shop and just eat fast food. When
people do cook, they rarely cook from scratch. This is all very unhealthy, and
the effect on the nation's girth, is visible, clear across the parking lot. A
lot of the people, who just waddle to and from their cars, seem unprepared for
what comes next. If they suddenly had to start living like the Russians, they
would blow out their knees.
Slide [16] The Soviet government threw resources at
immunization programs, infectious disease control, and basic care. It directly
operated a system of state-owned clinics, hospitals, and sanatoriums. People
with fatal ailments or chronic conditions often had reason to complain, and had
to pay for private care – if they had the money.
In the United States, medicine is for profit. People seems to think nothing of this fact. There are really very few fields of endeavor to which Americans would deny the profit motive. The problem is, once the economy is removed, so is the profit, along with the services it once helped to motivate.
In the United States, medicine is for profit. People seems to think nothing of this fact. There are really very few fields of endeavor to which Americans would deny the profit motive. The problem is, once the economy is removed, so is the profit, along with the services it once helped to motivate.
Slide [17] The Soviet education system was generally quite excellent. It produced an overwhelmingly literate population and many great specialists. The education was free at all levels, but higher education sometimes paid a stipend, and often provided room and board. The educational system held together quite well after the economy collapsed. The problem was that the graduates had no jobs to look forward to upon graduation. Many of them lost their way.
The higher education system in the United States is good at many things – government and industrial research, team sports, vocational training... Primary and secondary education fails to achieve in 12 years what Soviet schools generally achieved in 8. The massive scale and expense of maintaining these institutions is likely to prove too much for the post-collapse environment. Illiteracy is already a problem in the United States, and we should expect it to get a lot worse.
Slide [18] The Soviet Union did not need to import energy. The production and distribution system faltered, but never collapsed. Price controls kept the lights on even as hyperinflation raged.
The term "market failure" seems to fit the energy situation in the United States. Free markets develop some pernicious characteristics when there are shortages of key commodities. During World War II, the United States government understood this, and successfully rationed many things, from gasoline to bicycle parts. But that was a long time ago. Since then, the inviolability of free markets has become an article of faith.
Slide [19] My conclusion is that the Soviet Union was much better-prepared for economic collapse than the United States is.
I have left out two important superpower asymmetries, because they don't have anything to do with collapse-preparedness. Some countries are simply luckier than others. But I will mention them, for the sake of completeness.
In terms of racial and ethnic composition, the United States resembles Yugoslavia more than it resembles Russia, so we shouldn't expect it to be as peaceful as Russia was, following the collapse. Ethnically mixed societies are fragile and have a tendency to explode.
In terms of religion, the Soviet Union was relatively free of apocalyptic doomsday cults. Very few people there wished for a planet-sized atomic fireball to herald the second coming of their savior. This was indeed a blessing.
Slide [20] One area in which I cannot discern any Collapse Gap is national politics. The ideologies may be different, but the blind adherence to them couldn't be more similar.
It is certainly more fun to watch two Capitalist parties go at each other than just having the one Communist party to vote for. The things they fight over in public are generally symbolic little tokens of social policy, chosen for ease of public posturing. The Communist party offered just one bitter pill. The two Capitalist parties offer a choice of two placebos. The latest innovation is the photo finish election, where each party buys 50% of the vote, and the result is pulled out of statistical noise, like a rabbit out of a hat.
The American way of dealing with dissent and with
protest is certainly more advanced: why imprison dissidents when you can just
let them shout into the wind to their heart's content?
The American approach to bookkeeping is more subtle
and nuanced than the Soviet. Why make a state secret of some statistic, when
you can just distort it, in obscure ways? Here's a simple example: inflation is
"controlled" by substituting hamburger for steak, in order to
minimize increases to Social Security payments.
Slide [21] Many people expend a lot of energy
protesting against their irresponsible, unresponsive government. It seems like
a terrible waste of time, considering how ineffectual their protests are. Is it
enough of a consolation for them to be able to read about their efforts in the
foreign press? I think that they would feel better if they tuned out the
politicians, the way the politicians tune them out. It's as easy as turning off
the television set. If they try it, they will probably observe that nothing
about their lives has changed, nothing at all, except maybe their mood has
improved. They might also find that they have more time and energy to devote to
more important things.
Slide [22] I will now sketch out some approaches,
realistic and otherwise, to closing the Collapse Gap. My little list of
approaches might seem a bit glib, but keep in mind that this is a very
difficult problem. In fact, it's important to keep in mind that not all
problems have solutions. I can promise you that we will not solve this problem
tonight. What I will try to do is to shed some light on it from several angles.
Slide [23] Many people rail against the
unresponsiveness and irresponsibility of the government. They often say things
like "What is needed is..." plus the name of some big, successful
government project from the glorious past – the Marshall Plan, the Manhattan
Project, the Apollo program. But there is nothing in the history books about a
government preparing for collapse. Gorbachev's "Perestroika" is an
example of a government trying to avert or delay collapse. It probably helped
speed it along.
Slide [24] There are some things that I would like
the government to take care of in preparation for collapse. I am particularly
concerned about all the radioactive and toxic installations, stockpiles, and
dumps. Future generations are unlikely to able to control them, especially if
global warming puts them underwater. There is enough of this muck sitting
around to kill off most of us. I am also worried about soldiers getting
stranded overseas – abandoning one's soldiers is among the most shameful things
a country can do. Overseas military bases should be dismantled, and the troops
repatriated. I'd like to see the huge prison population whittled away in a
controlled manner, ahead of time, instead of in a chaotic general amnesty.
Lastly, I think that this farce with debts that will never be repaid, has gone
on long enough. Wiping the slate clean will give society time to readjust. So,
you see, I am not asking for any miracles. Although, if any of these things do
get done, I would consider it a miracle.
Slide [25] A private sector solution is not
impossible; just very, very unlikely. Certain Soviet state enterprises were
basically states within states. They controlled what amounted to an entire
economic system, and could go on even without the larger economy. They kept to
this arrangement even after they were privatized. They drove Western management
consultants mad, with their endless kindergartens, retirement homes, laundries,
and free clinics. These weren't part of their core competency, you see. They
needed to divest and to streamline their operations. The Western management
gurus overlooked the most important thing: the core competency of these
enterprises lay in their ability to survive economic collapse. Maybe the young
geniuses at Google can wrap their heads around this one, but I doubt that their
stockholders will.
Slide [26] It's important to understand that the
Soviet Union achieved collapse-preparedness inadvertently, and not because of
the success of some crash program. Economic collapse has a way of turning
economic negatives into positives. The last thing we want is a perfectly
functioning, growing, prosperous economy that suddenly collapses one day, and
leaves everybody in the lurch. It is not necessary for us to embrace the tenets
of command economy and central planning to match the Soviet lackluster
performance in this area. We have our own methods, that are working almost as
well. I call them "boondoggles." They are solutions to problems that
cause more problems than they solve.
Just look around you, and you will see boondoggles sprouting up everywhere, in every field of endeavor: we have military boondoggles like Iraq, financial boondoggles like the doomed retirement system, medical boondoggles like private health insurance, legal boondoggles like the intellectual property system. The combined weight of all these boondoggles is slowly but surely pushing us all down. If it pushes us down far enough, then economic collapse, when it arrives, will be like falling out of a ground floor window. We just have to help this process along, or at least not interfere with it. So if somebody comes to you and says "I want to make a boondoggle that runs on hydrogen" – by all means encourage him! It's not as good as a boondoggle that burns money directly, but it's a step in the right direction.
Just look around you, and you will see boondoggles sprouting up everywhere, in every field of endeavor: we have military boondoggles like Iraq, financial boondoggles like the doomed retirement system, medical boondoggles like private health insurance, legal boondoggles like the intellectual property system. The combined weight of all these boondoggles is slowly but surely pushing us all down. If it pushes us down far enough, then economic collapse, when it arrives, will be like falling out of a ground floor window. We just have to help this process along, or at least not interfere with it. So if somebody comes to you and says "I want to make a boondoggle that runs on hydrogen" – by all means encourage him! It's not as good as a boondoggle that burns money directly, but it's a step in the right direction.
Slide [27] Certain types of mainstream economic
behavior are not prudent on a personal level, and are also counterproductive to
bridging the Collapse Gap. Any behavior that might result in continued economic
growth and prosperity is counterproductive: the higher you jump, the harder you
land. It is traumatic to go from having a big retirement fund to having no
retirement fund because of a market crash. It is also traumatic to go from a
high income to little or no income. If, on top of that, you have kept yourself
incredibly busy, and suddenly have nothing to do, then you will really be in
rough shape.
Economic collapse is about the worst possible time for someone to suffer a nervous breakdown, yet this is what often happens. The people who are most at risk psychologically are successful middle-aged men. When their career is suddenly over, their savings are gone, and their property worthless, much of their sense of self-worth is gone as well. They tend to drink themselves to death and commit suicide in disproportionate numbers. Since they tend to be the most experienced and capable people, this is a staggering loss to society.
If the economy, and your place within it, is really important to you, you will be really hurt when it goes away. You can cultivate an attitude of studied indifference, but it has to be more than just a conceit. You have to develop the lifestyle and the habits and the physical stamina to back it up. It takes a lot of creativity and effort to put together a fulfilling existence on the margins of society. After the collapse, these margins may turn out to be some of the best places to live.
Slide [28] I hope that I didn't make it sound as if the Soviet collapse was a walk in the park, because it was really quite awful in many ways. The point that I do want to stress is that when this economy collapses, it is bound to be much worse. Another point I would like to stress is that collapse here is likely to be permanent. The factors that allowed Russia and the other former Soviet republics to recover are not present here.
In spite of all this, I believe that in every age and circumstance, people can sometimes find not just a means and a reason to survive, but enlightenment, fulfillment, and freedom. If we can find them even after the economy collapses, then why not start looking for them now?
Economic collapse is about the worst possible time for someone to suffer a nervous breakdown, yet this is what often happens. The people who are most at risk psychologically are successful middle-aged men. When their career is suddenly over, their savings are gone, and their property worthless, much of their sense of self-worth is gone as well. They tend to drink themselves to death and commit suicide in disproportionate numbers. Since they tend to be the most experienced and capable people, this is a staggering loss to society.
If the economy, and your place within it, is really important to you, you will be really hurt when it goes away. You can cultivate an attitude of studied indifference, but it has to be more than just a conceit. You have to develop the lifestyle and the habits and the physical stamina to back it up. It takes a lot of creativity and effort to put together a fulfilling existence on the margins of society. After the collapse, these margins may turn out to be some of the best places to live.
Slide [28] I hope that I didn't make it sound as if the Soviet collapse was a walk in the park, because it was really quite awful in many ways. The point that I do want to stress is that when this economy collapses, it is bound to be much worse. Another point I would like to stress is that collapse here is likely to be permanent. The factors that allowed Russia and the other former Soviet republics to recover are not present here.
In spite of all this, I believe that in every age and circumstance, people can sometimes find not just a means and a reason to survive, but enlightenment, fulfillment, and freedom. If we can find them even after the economy collapses, then why not start looking for them now?
Thank you.
Editorial
Notes: Energy Bulletin published an
excerpt from this talk yesterday (Dec 3), and Dmitry reported that his small
webserver was overwhelmed with requests. Although it's good news that his
writing has such a following, PLEASE don't access the document on his web
server (Club Orlov). The same content is here, on Energy Bulletin's heavier
duty webserver. --- Orlov has many penetrating insights, couched in his dark
humor. Particularly striking is the strong case he makes that the peoples of
the USSR were actually better prepared for a collapse because
·
they had learned to
be more self-reliant
·
many crucial
functions (like housing and transportation) were taken care of by the state
sector which was more stable than a private sector would have been.
Orlov's cynicism
about the possibility of intelligent government action was probably justified
in the case of the Soviet Union, but I think it would be a tragic mistake to
abandon efforts to change the direction of the U.S. The Soviets had little
chance to make democratic institutions work. We do have that chance. -BA
UPDATE: Dmitri Orlov writes on March 4, 2007: You wrote that "The Soviets
had little chance to make democratic institutions work." That's not
entirely true. Perestroika and Glasnost were all about democracy, and in my
opinion it had the same chance of success as the hopelessly gerrymandered
system that passes for democracy in the US, (although much less than any
proper, modern democracy, in which the Bush regime would have been put out of
power quite a while ago, after a simple parliamentary vote of no confidence and
early elections). The problem is that, in a collapse scenario, democracy is the
least effective system of government one can possibly think of (think Weimar,
or the Russian Interim Government) - a topic I cover in Post-Soviet Lessons.
Lastly, I don't think calling me a cynic is exactly accurate: I've been in the
US a long time, watching the system become progressively more dysfunctional
with each passing political season. It seems to me that it is not necessarily
cynical to be able to spot a solid trend, but that it could be simply
observant.
UPDATE (October 30, 2007): We've noticed an influx of visitors to
Dmitry Orlov's article, since its mention on several websites. Dmitry writes
that his new book, "Reinventing Collapse," is due from New Society
Publishers in the springtime.
Labels:
Dmitry Orlov,
Economic Collapse,
Economics,
Russia,
United States
Wednesday, 27 November 2013
Closing the 'Collapse Gap': the USSR was better prepared for collapse than the US PART I
By Dmitry Orlov
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. I am not an expert or a
scholar or an activist. I am more of an eye-witness. I watched the Soviet Union
collapse, and I have tried to put my observations into a concise message. I
will leave it up to you to decide just how urgent a message it is.
My talk tonight is about the lack of collapse-preparedness
here in the United States. I will compare it with the situation in the Soviet
Union, prior to its collapse. The rhetorical device I am going to use is the
"Collapse Gap" – to go along with the Nuclear Gap, and the Space Gap,
and various other superpower gaps that were fashionable during the Cold War.
Slide [2] The subject of economic collapse is generally a sad one. But I am an optimistic, cheerful sort of person, and I believe that, with a bit of preparation, such events can be taken in stride. As you can probably surmise, I am actually rather keen on observing economic collapses. Perhaps when I am really old, all collapses will start looking the same to me, but I am not at that point yet.
And this next one certainly has me intrigued. From
what I've seen and read, it seems that there is a fair chance that the U.S.
economy will collapse sometime within the foreseeable future. It also would
seem that we won't be particularly well-prepared for it. As things stand, the
U.S. economy is poised to perform something like a disappearing act. And so I
am eager to put my observations of the Soviet collapse to good use.
Slide [3] I anticipate that some people will react
rather badly to having their country compared to the USSR. I would like to
assure you that the Soviet people would have reacted similarly, had the United
States collapsed first. Feelings aside, here are two 20th century superpowers,
who wanted more or less the same things – things like technological progress,
economic growth, full employment, and world domination – but they disagreed
about the methods. And they obtained similar results – each had a good run,
intimidated the whole planet, and kept the other scared. Each eventually went
bankrupt.
Slide [4] The USA and the USSR were evenly matched
in many categories, but let me just mention four.
The Soviet manned space program is alive and well
under Russian management, and now offers first-ever space charters. The
Americans have been hitching rides on the Soyuz while their remaining
spaceships sit in the shop.
The arms race has not produced a clear winner, and
that is excellent news, because Mutual Assured Destruction remains in effect.
Russia still has more nuclear warheads than the US, and has supersonic cruise
missile technology that can penetrate any missile shield, especially a
nonexistent one.
The Jails Race once showed the Soviets with a
decisive lead, thanks to their innovative GULAG program. But they gradually
fell behind, and in the end the Jails Race has been won by the Americans, with
the highest percentage of people in jail ever.
The Hated Evil Empire Race is also finally being
won by the Americans. It's easy now that they don't have anyone to compete
against.
Slide [5] Continuing with our list of superpower similarities, many of the problems that sunk the Soviet Union are now endangering the United States as well. Such as a huge, well-equipped, very expensive military, with no clear mission, bogged down in fighting Muslim insurgents. Such as energy shortfalls linked to peaking oil production. Such as a persistently unfavorable trade balance, resulting in runaway foreign debt. Add to that a delusional self-image, an inflexible ideology, and an unresponsive political system.
Slide [6] An economic collapse is amazing to
observe, and very interesting if described accurately and in detail. A general
description tends to fall short of the mark, but let me try. An economic
arrangement can continue for quite some time after it becomes untenable,
through sheer inertia. But at some point a tide of broken promises and
invalidated assumptions sweeps it all out to sea. One such untenable
arrangement rests on the notion that it is possible to perpetually borrow more
and more money from abroad, to pay for more and more energy imports, while the
price of these imports continues to double every few years. Free money with
which to buy energy equals free energy, and free energy does not occur in
nature. This must therefore be a transient condition. When the flow of energy
snaps back toward equilibrium, much of the US economy will be forced to shut
down.
Slide [7] I've described what happened to Russia in
some detail in one of my articles, which is available on SurvivingPeakOil.com. I don't see why
what happens to the United States should be entirely dissimilar, at least in
general terms. The specifics will be different, and we will get to them in a
moment. We should certainly expect shortages of fuel, food, medicine, and
countless consumer items, outages of electricity, gas, and water, breakdowns in
transportation systems and other infrastructure, hyperinflation, widespread
shutdowns and mass layoffs, along with a lot of despair, confusion, violence,
and lawlessness. We definitely should not expect any grand rescue plans,
innovative technology programs, or miracles of social cohesion.
The population of the United States is almost
entirely car-dependent, and relies on markets that control oil import,
refining, and distribution. They also rely on continuous public investment in
road construction and repair. The cars themselves require a steady stream of
imported parts, and are not designed to last very long. When these intricately
interconnected systems stop functioning, much of the population will find
itself stranded.
Slide [9] One important element of
collapse-preparedness is making sure that you don't need a functioning economy
to keep a roof over your head. In the Soviet Union, all housing belonged to the
government, which made it available directly to the people. Since all housing
was also built by the government, it was only built in places that the
government could service using public transportation. After the collapse,
almost everyone managed to keep their place.
In the United States, very few people own their
place of residence free and clear, and even they need an income to pay real
estate taxes. People without an income face homelessness. When the economy
collapses, very few people will continue to have an income, so homelessness
will become rampant. Add to that the car-dependent nature of most suburbs, and
what you will get is mass migrations of homeless people toward city centers.
Slide [10] Soviet public transportation was more or
less all there was, but there was plenty of it. There were also a few private
cars, but so few that gasoline rationing and shortages were mostly
inconsequential. All of this public infrastructure was designed to be almost
infinitely maintainable, and continued to run even as the rest of the economy
collapsed.
The population of the United States is almost
entirely car-dependent, and relies on markets that control oil import,
refining, and distribution. They also rely on continuous public investment in
road construction and repair. The cars themselves require a steady stream of
imported parts, and are not designed to last very long. When these intricately
interconnected systems stop functioning, much of the population will find
itself stranded.
Slide [11] Economic collapse affects public sector
employment almost as much as private sector employment, eventually. Because
government bureaucracies tend to be slow to act, they collapse more slowly. Also,
because state-owned enterprises tend to be inefficient, and stockpile
inventory, there is plenty of it left over, for the employees to take home, and
use in barter. Most Soviet employment was in the public sector, and this gave
people some time to think of what to do next.
Private enterprises tend to be much more efficient
at many things. Such laying off their people, shutting their doors, and
liquidating their assets. Since most employment in the United States is in the
private sector, we should expect the transition to permanent unemployment to be
quite abrupt for most people.
Slide [12] When confronting hardship, people
usually fall back on their families for support. The Soviet Union experienced
chronic housing shortages, which often resulted in three generations living
together under one roof. This didn't make them happy, but at least they were
used to each other. The usual expectation was that they would stick it out
together, come what may.
In the United States, families tend to be atomized,
spread out over several states. They sometimes have trouble tolerating each
other when they come together for Thanksgiving, or Christmas, even during the
best of times. They might find it difficult to get along, in bad times. There
is already too much loneliness in this country, and I doubt that economic
collapse will cure it.
Slide [13] To keep evil at bay, Americans require
money. In an economic collapse, there is usually hyperinflation, which wipes
out savings. There is also rampant unemployment, which wipes out incomes. The
result is a population that is largely penniless.
In the Soviet Union, very little could be obtained
for money. It was treated as tokens rather than as wealth, and was shared among
friends. Many things – housing and transportation among them – were either free
or almost free.
Slide [14] Soviet consumer products were always an
object of derision – refrigerators that kept the house warm – and the food, and
so on. You'd be lucky if you got one at all, and it would be up to you to make
it work once you got it home. But once you got it to work, it would become a priceless
family heirloom, handed down from generation to generation, sturdy, and almost
infinitely maintainable.
In the United States, you often hear that something
"is not worth fixing." This is enough to make a Russian see red. I
once heard of an elderly Russian who became irate when a hardware store in
Boston wouldn't sell him replacement bedsprings: "People are throwing away
perfectly good mattresses, how am I supposed to fix them?"
Economic collapse tends to shut down both local
production and imports, and so it is vitally important that anything you own
wears out slowly, and that you can fix it yourself if it breaks. Soviet-made
stuff generally wore incredibly hard. The Chinese-made stuff you can get around
here – much less so.
Labels:
Dmitry Orlov,
Economic Collapse,
Economics,
Russia,
United States
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

























