By Alice
Philipson
The chief executive of Britain's biggest abortion charity has said women are
legally free to arrange an abortion because they are unhappy with the sex of
their unborn baby.
Ann
Furedi, of BPAS, said the law does not prevent women from choosing a
termination on the grounds of gender and she even compared it to abortion after
rape.
Mrs
Furedi's comments come weeks after it was disclosed that the CPS had decided
not to prosecute two doctors who were exposed by a Daily Telegraph
investigation arranging terminations purely because the unborn baby was a girl.
A group of
50 MPs, drawn from across the party divide, then wrote to this newspaper
warning that the decision was a “step back in the fight for gender equality”
and effectively changes the law without proper authority.
Jeremy
Hunt, the Health Secretary, has written to the Attorney General pressing for a
full explanation.
However,
Mrs Furedi – whose charity carries out more than a quarter of abortions in
England and Wales, argued that if doctors believe going ahead with the
pregnancy would damage the mental health of the mother, the abortion is within
the law
Writing
for online magazine Spiked, she said: "A doctor agreeing to an abortion on
grounds of rape would be breaking the law no more and no less than a doctor who
agrees an abortion on grounds of sex selection," she said.
"While
it is true that the sex of the foetus is not a legal ground for abortion, nor
is rape, or incest, or being 13 years old. Nor is being homeless, or abandoned,
or just feeling there's no way you can bring a child into the world... yet they
are all reasons why a doctor may believe a women has met the legal grounds of
abortion."
She added:
"The woman gives her reasons, the doctor decides on the grounds as set out
in the law ... there is no legal requirement to deny a woman an abortion if she
has a sex preference, providing that the legal grounds are still met.
"The
law is silent on the matter of gender selection, just as it is silent on
rape."
Since
abortion was legalised in 1967, the majority of terminations have been carried
out on the basis that two doctors have agreed a continuation of the pregnancy
would risk the mental health of the pregnant woman or her family.
Mrs Furedi
questioned whether a woman should be made to have the baby if "her family
will disown her and she'll lose her home, her husband whom she loves, and her
existing children."
No comments:
Post a Comment