Strategic Culture Foundation | Alistair Crooke
For a Leviathan to function, it must remain rational and powerful, Alastair Crooke writes.
Israel’s strategy from past decades continues to rest on the hope of
achieving some literal Chimeric transformative ‘de-radicalisation’ of
both Palestinians and of the Region, writ large – a de-radicalisation
that will make ‘Israel safe’. This has been the ‘holy grail’ objective
for Zionists since Israel was first founded. The code word for this
chimaera today is the ‘Abraham Accords’.
Ron Dermer, Netanyahu’s Strategic Affairs Minister, former Israeli
Ambassador to Washington and key Trump ‘whisperer’ – writes Anna Barsky
in Ma’ariv (Hebrew) on 24 August – “sees
reality with cold political eyes. He is convinced that a real agreement
[on Gaza] will never be concluded with Hamas, but [only] with the
United States. What is needed, Dermer says, is the Americans’ adoption
of Israel’s principles: the same five points that the Cabinet approved:
disarmament of Hamas, return of all hostages, complete demilitarization
of Gaza, Israeli security control in the Strip – and an alternative
civilian government that is not Hamas and not the Palestinian
Authority”.
From the perspective of Dermer, a partial hostage release deal –
which Hamas has accepted – would be a political disaster. By contrast,
were Washington to endorse the Dermer outcome – as an ‘American plan’ –
Barsky infers Dermer suggesting: “we would have a situation in which everyone benefits”. Moreover, in Dermer’s logic,
“the mere opening of a partial deal gives Hamas a window of two to
three months, during which it can strengthen itself and even try to
obtain a different ‘final scenario’ from that of the Americans – one
that suits [Hamas] better”. “This, according to Dermer, is the truly dangerous scenario”, writes Barsky.
Dermer has for years insisted that Israel can have no peace without the prior ‘transformative de-radicalisation’ of all Palestinians. “If we do it right”, Ron Dermer says, “it will make Israel stronger – and the U.S. too!”
Some years earlier, when Dermer was asked what he saw to be the
solution to the Palestinian conflict. He replied that both the West Bank
and Gaza must be totally dis-armed. Yet, more important than
disarmament however, was the absolute necessity that all Palestinians
must be mutationally “de-radicalised”.
When asked to expand, Dermer pointed approvingly
to the outcome of WW2: The Germans were defeated, but more
significantly, the Japanese had been fully ‘de-radicalised’ and rendered
docile by the war’s end:
“Japan had U.S. forces for 75 years. Germany — U.S. forces for 75
years. And if anyone thinks that was by agreement at the beginning
they’re kidding themselves. It was imposed, then they understood it was
good for them. And over time there was a mutual interest in keeping it”.
Trump is aware of Dermer’s thesis, but seemingly it is Netanyahu who instinctively dithers, so Barsky writes:
“A partial deal [with Hamas] will almost certainly lead
to the resignation of Smotrich and Ben Gvir [from the government]… The
government will fall apart … A partial deal means the end of the
right-right government … Netanyahu knows this well, which is why his
hesitation is so difficult. And yet, there is a limit to how long one
can hold the rope at both ends”.
Trump seemingly accepts the ‘Dermer Thesis’: “I think they want to die, and it’s very, very bad”, Trump said of Hamas before leaving for his recent weekend trip to Scotland. “It got to a point where you’re [i.e. Israel] gonna have to finish the job”.
But Dermer’s notion about having the consciousness of adversaries
seared by defeat was never just about Hamas alone. It extended to all
Palestinians and the region as a whole – and, of course to Iran in
particular.
Read more
