The Hypocrisy of Michael Moore, Corporate Feminists and Controlled Opposition of Women's March in Washington

Comment: "It's the hypocrisy." Hear, hear. 

-------------------------

Sane Progressive
YouTube
Via Sott.net 

Mainstream media NEVER would have given a 24/7 spotlight to any event that threatened the power interests. On the hypocrisy of Michael Moore, Corporate Feminists, & Partisan Hacks. Time to do the shadow work. 

The 2014 VMAs: All About Oversexualization Pushed by Music Industry Puppets

Vigilant Citizen

The 2014 VMAs were focused on a single theme – a theme that was expressed using most of the stars of the show. From Nicki Minaj and Ariana Grande to Iggy Azalea and Beyonce, the sight and the sounds of the VMAs were about one thing: Oversexualization using Illuminati puppets. 

Last year’s VMAs were all about Miley Cyrus acting like a fully programmed Beta Kitten. This year, nearly all of the performers who took the stage were acting like fully programmed Beta Kittens. When the “highlights” of an award show are the butt implants of Nicki Minaj and (most likely) Iggy Azalea, you know there wasn’t much substance there. After the show, MTV reported as “news” that Austin Mahone said about Nicki Minaj:

“Her butt was just huge. That was all I could focus on.”

This pretty much sums up the 2014 VMAs: a dumbstruck audience staring at butts for a few hours, mixed with some industry pawns getting shiny trophies. While some viewers might say “That was awesome!”, let’s not forget that the target audience of MTV are born around the year 2000. They are the ones growing up watching this, absorbing the sights and sounds. And the sights and sounds of the 2014 VMAs sent a clear message to these youths.

Oversexualization means, simply, “sexualizing excessively”. Yes, making love is a wonderful part of life, but when this act is debased, corrupted, exploited, and sold to young, immature minds, it can produce lifelong negative psychological and interpersonal effects. However, to the occult elite, those effects are desirable because it produces a population with “loose morals”, which is just the kind of population they are looking to create.

Read more

Lady Gaga’s Leaked Video “Do What U Want” featuring R. Kelly Glorifies Entertainment Industry Abuse

Vigilant Citizen

There are so many things that are wrong with Lady Gaga’s video Do What U Want that it boggles the mind. One can understand why the video was not released. On the other hand, why was it even shot? It was a horrible idea even before a single frame was captured on camera.

First, the song features R. Kelly. That’s all I need to say. For those who don’t know, he was accused of various offenses involving underage girls. In January, the Village Voice published a few articles describing R. Kelly’s “stomach-churning” assaults, refreshing the memories of “fans” who seem to have forgotten his crimes.

Read more

Miley Cyrus: Follows in the Footsteps of Madonna, Beyonce, Rihanna etc. The Pop-Whore archetype

I mean, seriously?  

I'm not some conservative puritan that wants this young woman to go back to her all American, girl-next-door days of Hanna Montana, when she looked like this:

 

But what kind of marketing leads this girl to feel she has to become this:

Miley Cyrus kicking off her Bangerz tour. (USA Today)

Music industry marketing, obviously. 

Does she actually realise how unoriginal and lazy this new tongue-toting sex nymph role is?

Beyonce, Katy Perry, Madonna, Lady Gaga, Rhianna etc - they're all doing pretty much the same spin, consciously or unconsciously and it rakes in the dollars as long as they continue to pimp their booties.

Even for the sex kitten programming so prevalent in the occult-obsessed music industry, Cyrus' transformation into the latest Pop-Whore-Materialist-Pimp is even more dramatic than Britney Spears. 

Far be it for me to stand for censorship or to be against freedom of expression. If that's the image that little Miss Miley and her rapidly accruing dollars wants to go for then good luck to her, though we've seen where it ends up countless times...

But it's not just about her choice of management. This music programming goes much deeper than that and even the most unaware are beginning to wake up to the fact that there is much more to the music industry symbolism than meets the eye.

Please don't think that this is remotely contributing to the emancipation of women and all the other narcissistic nonsense that attempts to pass for feminist discourse these days. The above isn't a healthy role model for kids nor is it really about popular music. It's about social engineering, perception management, dumbing down, mind control - call it what you will from whichever angle you wish to approach it.

This is a form of mass mediocrity and cultural abuse where young hormonal girls are directed to the "libido of the ugly" mistaking it for significance; that it is not only fashionable and feminist but actually how a girl's meant to be; ramming home the tough bimbo role model with a tongue flapping and an ass in the air like it's just what gals should do...Because hey! That means a free spirit - that means liberation! 

Porn for kids is the program!  So get with it gals and guys!

Well, sex sells, we all know that. So, young men will continue to view girls and women as bodycentric sluts that need a good pounding, just as mass music tells them over and over with a sickly sweet production treatments which all sound the same. The Music market will respond by pumping new versions of formulaic themes of simulated masturbation, doggy-style sex and facilitation of mind programming iconography and occult imagery to a whooping audience of tweens and teens. And it will continue to deliver the dosh, because that's what passes for "art" these days, where the younger generation offer up their endocrine glands to me milked for voyeristic sensation and induced sexuality devoid of meaning.

Do I sound like my dad? Well, maybe he had a point after all. But I don't think he knew that besides rapacious greed and poor music there were also occult clubs and mind control embedded in the entertainment industries. (I'm afraid so).

Oh, but young women like Cyrus are in control ....

If only they knew how truly out of control they are and how they are merely celebrating the vacuous products they have willingly become. 

Sex in society: too much raunch, too young

 Too much: a scene from the TV series Sherlock, left, 

and an explicit pose from Lady Gaga

"So what is there to complain about? It is the availability – indeed, the marketing – of such raunchy videos to the young and impressionable that disturbs me. Something has shifted in our culture to bring sub-teens within the orbit of suggestive sexual activity. T-shirts with cheeky, even lewd slogans – jokes that only adults can understand – are designed and sold to the under-10s. Children can hunt on a multitude of television channels for something that looks vaguely adult and vaguely transgressive. Can it be good for them? I for one would not be prepared to take the risk." 

Telegraph

Joan Bakewell

"Three million people saw your bottom!” So ran the shocked letter I received in the late 1960s after I had presented Late Night Line-Up wearing a daringly short skirt. Back then, minis were still news: Jean Shrimpton had recently caused an international storm by wearing one at the Melbourne races in Australia. Certainly, no women wore them to present BBC chat shows – no women presented chat shows in those days.

Looking at the pictures today, a miniskirt seems harmless. But some people took offence: they felt mine was too raunchy. They were alarmed, convinced that such clothing somehow put the morals of the nation at risk. It might enflame people’s lusts and prompt them to acts of sexual behaviour that, by the standards of the day, were to be deplored: sex before marriage, for example. 

Sex makes one generation fearful for the next. It has always been so. And in each generation, there are always those who consider the more risqué edges of the entertainment industry to be going too far. In 1890s Paris, onlookers took against the frills and suspenders of can-can dancers. By the 1950s, its Crazy Horse cabaret was making witty mockery of such shows, while itself leaving little to the audience’s imagination. At the same time in Britain, nudes posing in tableaux at the Windmill Theatre were still not permitted to move. 

Now I find myself caught up in concerns about the sexualisation of children today. This week, I was quoted as condemning outright Lady Gaga and other performers for seeming obsessed with appearing at their raunchiest in their pop videos and on prime-time television shows. So have I changed sides? Or has the world changed? 

It could be that I have grown old. I am now in my late 70s; I no longer belong to the generation that rejoiced in outraging its elders and struggled against the strictures of Mary Whitehouse (I thought she was wrong then, and I still do).

But in my time, I have loved the gyrations of Pan’s People, the Top of the Pops dancers whose routines were flirty rather than raunchy. Late Night Line-Up regularly championed what then seemed like avant-garde works showing life in the raw (in all senses) – films such as Saturday Night and Sunday Morning, and plays such as Nell Dunn’s Up the Junction. Has there been a significant change since then or am I an ageing spoilsport?

In 2001, I made a four-part series for BBC Two called Taboo, which looked back at how censorship had changed over my lifetime. During filming, I broke several taboos of my own: using words that would normally be bleeped out; watching a porn film in production; and being filmed casting an appraising eye over a young male with a sturdy erection. I also had the ''fun’’ of pornography explained to me by young men, including Toby Young, today a pillar of Michael Gove’s educational establishment. None of this, I argued, was harming my moral values. Sex I considered a life-enhancing activity, promoting pleasure, well-being and, if you were lucky, a lasting, loving relationship. But, most particularly, it was watched by adults who were able to judge for themselves, certainly not by children. That is what is different today. Children are the new target market.

What has changed is not the fascination with sex; that will always be part of human nature, and people will continue to find ways of gratifying it. Once, such pleasures were exercises in power, with secret indulgences often illegal. Herod served up the head of John the Baptist to have Salome dance for him. Victorian gentlemen had their cabinets of Eastern erotica. In the 1950s, you had to belong to a private club to be allowed to watch strippers at work. 

While our curiosity with sex persists, the means of access to sexual material has broadened exponentially. The media explosion brought on by the internet brings performances within the reach of anyone, children included. And today’s smartphone-savvy youth think nothing of forwarding explicit images and video clips to others’ handsets. This week, a new set of contestants entered the Celebrity Big Brother house to take part in Channel Five’s fly-on-the-wall show whose audience is mostly millions of young people. Prior to his incarceration, one housemate proudly boasted of his intent to have sex on screen – “and none of this under-the-covers ----”.

Read more

Transhumanism, PsyWar and B.E.P.’s “Imma Be”

"The first time you watch the movie, “Saw”, you might be freaked out by the gruesome murders and torture. But if you watch it another hundred times, I can guarantee that it won’t bother you very much anymore. Over time, when we are exposed to images of graphic violence, sexuality or ideas utilizing combinations of such images (cognitive dissonance) we slowly become desensitized to these ideas, and we are conditioned to stop reacting to them as strongly."

 ------------

Vigilant Citizen

The article named “The Transhumanist and Police State Agenda in Pop Music” briefly explored the transhumanist theme of the Black Eyed Peas’ video “Imma Be/Rock that Body”. Vigilant Citizen collaborator LVB expands on this subject and describes the Psychological Warfare techniques used in this video.

 

The Black Eyed Peas “Imma Be / Rock that Body” video is a masterpiece of high tech computer-generated imagery and state of the art digital music production. It is also one of the most blatant examples of Psychological Warfare and deception that I have ever seen in modern mass media. 

This article will discuss

1) What Transhumanism actually is.

2) The massive use of Psychological Warfare techniques in this video and all forms of mass media.

3) Analysis of the video, itself – to show you how these psychological concepts, the occult and Transhumanist symbolism and the deceptive storyline are integrated in this video to promote the dangerous agenda of the cult known as Transhumanism.

Read More