THE “GIANT LEAP” — THE WEF’S MOST RADICAL BLUEPRINT YET

Jim Ferguson

THE “GIANT LEAP” — THE WEF’S MOST RADICAL BLUEPRINT YET 

The global elites have finally said the quiet part out loud: their so-called “Giant Leap” is not a proposal — it’s a plan to reshape society from the top down, whether the public agrees or not. 

In their own words, this is a “complete shake-up… everything, everywhere, all at once.” 

They call it “well-being.” 

But look closely at what they demand: 

• A total restructuring of the global economy 

• Mass redistribution of wealth 

• A shift to plant-based, managed diets 

• Centralised control of energy, consumption and resources 

• Universal “dividends” tied to global commons 

• A circular, regenerative economic model 

• Fossil fuels phased out 

• Material consumption restricted 

• And the public “brought along the journey” 

This isn’t environmental policy.

It’s a controlled society. 

 They admit it will be disruptive, that it will create shocks, and that nothing less than five extraordinary turnarounds — imposed simultaneously — will be needed to force the world into their vision. 

They talk about fairness. 

They talk about justice. 

But what they describe is a technocratic governance system powerful enough to decide: 

What you eat. 

How you travel. 

What you consume. 

What you earn. 

What you own. 

And what you’re allowed to do. 

They’re not asking for permission. 

 They’re announcing what comes next. 

 A society run by unelected global planners, not democratic nations. 

A system where compliance replaces consent. 

A future built by elites who believe your freedoms are negotiable — but their power is not. 

Stay awake. The “Giant Leap” isn’t progress. 

It’s control dressed as compassion.

Read More (video)

WHAT THE GREEN NEW DEAL IS REALLY ABOUT — AND IT’S NOT THE CLIMATE

Watts Up With That?
By Allan M.R. MacRae,
B.A.Sc., M.Eng.

On July 4, 2019, I published the article “THE COST TO SOCIETY OF RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM”.
 
There was a reason why this article was published on July 4. My article begins:

Ever wonder why extremists attack honest scientists who oppose global warming and climate change hysteria? Ever wonder why climate extremists refuse to debate the science?
IT IS BECAUSE GLOBAL WARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM WAS NEVER ABOUT THE SCIENCE – IT WAS ALWAYS A FALSE NARRATIVE, A SMOKESCREEN FOR THE TOTALITARIAN OBJECTIVES OF THE EXTREME LEFT.

Some people may think this was statement was inaccurate, or that I was being unfair. However, one week after my article was published, Democratic New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, fully verified my statement. He said, as written in the article below:

“The interesting thing about the Green New Deal, is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all,” Chakrabarti said… … “Do you guys think of it as a climate thing? Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing,” Chakrabarti added.

Following is another excerpt from my July 4 article that demonstrates how utterly impractical the Green New Deal is – the Green New Deal is energy and economic lunacy – it cannot work:

Read more

Full page ad in NYT today slams Attorney Generals climate witch hunt

Watts Up with That?

Today, CEI sponsored a full-page advertisement in The New York Times highlighting abusive efforts by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General Claude Walker, and a coalition of other “AGs United for Clean Power” to silence the speech of more than 100 businesses, nonprofits, and private individuals who question the AGs’ positions on climate change. Published as an open letter, the ad features signatures from 43 organizations, legal experts, and individuals who value Americans’ First Amendment rights and believe they should be protected.

 Full text below. View the ad as a full color PDF here.

 Read more

Climate change root cause of Syrian war: Britain’s Prince Charles

Comment: Like most of the individuals that make up our modern-day monarchies Prince Charles' shows just how out of touch and idiotic his line of thinking is. While environmental scarcity is a factor, it is the overarching objective of Western elites and their creation of proxy armies (Al-Qaeda/ISIS) and the devastation they have wrought that is the primary culprit. To graft on climate change ideas onto the attempts to oust Assad and the consequent destabillisation as something that could have been dealt with as if it wasn't wholly sourced from the Establishment of which he is part, is both ignorant and insulting to the families who suffer and forced to flee. A very much engineered migration. 

Then it's hardly surprising give that British Royalty has a tradition of eco-fascism ring-fenced with a feudalistic ethos.

------------------------------- 

Yahoo 

 

The heir to the British throne is due to give a keynote speech at the opening of a global climate summit in Paris next week where 118 leaders will gather to try to nail down a deal to limit rising greenhouse gas emissions. 

 

The prince said in an interview with Sky News, to be aired on Monday and recorded before the Nov. 13 attacks in Paris, that such symptoms were a “classic case of not dealing with the problem”. 

 

“Some of us were saying 20 something years ago that if we didn’t tackle these issues, you would see ever greater conflict over scarce resources and ever greater difficulties over drought, and the accumulating effect of climate change which means that people have to move,” he said. 

 

“And in fact there’s very good evidence indeed that one of the major reasons for this horror in Syria, funnily enough, was a drought that lasted for about five or six years, which meant that huge numbers of people in the end had to leave the land but increasingly they came into the cities.” 

 

Read more

 

COP 21: UN plan to make legally binding climate change laws – worldwide

Blacklisted News

Cop 21 or the Paris Climate Conference that is scheduled to take place in Paris on November 30, 2015, will be unlike other UN climate summits or climate conferences in the past. COP 21 has a scarily grandiose objective: in their own words “to achieve a legally binding and universal agreement on climate … for the first time in over 20 years of UN negotiations.” If they achieve their aim, we would be faced with the horrifying prospect that the mythology of AGW (anthropogenic global warming or manmade global warming) would become entrenched in law, thus solidifying it as fact in the minds of many. It would be a giant step towards Global Governance or a One World Government with a worldwide carbon tax, for so long now the wet dream of the New World Order manipulators.

COP 21: Trying to Make the AGW Fallacy Into Law

 

The objective sought at COP 21 has been a long time coming. Obama revealed how important this was to some factions of the NWO when he stated that his “definition of leadership would be leading on climate change, an international accord that potentially we’ll get in Paris“, in response to the assertion put forth by the interviewer that Putin was challenging Obama’s leadership. If worldwide climate change laws are just as important to the NWO as controlling Syria, it gives you some idea of what is at stake here. Some have also suggested that the upcoming COP 21 was the reason former Aussie PM Tony Abbott lost leadership of his party (Abbot was strongly opposed to the idea of AGW) and replaced with pro-AGW and Goldman Sachs man, Malcolm Turnbull.

Normally, the annual COP (Conference of Parties) meets to review the implementation of the “Rio Convention”, drawn up at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. It includes the UNFCCC (UN Framework on Climate Change) which entered into force in 1994 and has 195 signatory parties. This time, COP 21 will be going all out with extra gusto to create a new set of planetary laws to ensure every nation must combat climate change, with the purported aim “of keeping global warming below 2°C“.

A Few Problems for COP 21: Antarctica, Greenland and the Arctic Aren’t Cooperating

 

Unfortunately for the global governance enthusiasts, who seek universal “consensus” among all nations and parts of the Earth, there are many factions that are not cooperating – include a couple of massive areas of ice, and a continent. Very recent data reports from multiple sources (NASA and AGU/BAS [American Geophysical Union and British Antarctic Survey]) are suggesting that not only is Antarctica not succumbing to global warming, but just the reverse – it is freezing over. Here are some quotes from the studies; this first one is from the NASA study:

“A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers … According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.”

The net gain may have slowed, but that is still a gigantic amount of ice to gain. This next one is from the joint AGU/BAS study:

“Since the record is 300 years long, we can see that the amount of snow that has been accumulating in this region since the 1990s is the highest we have seen in the last 300 years … Annual snow accumulation increased in the early 20^th century, rising 30 percent between 1900 and 2010.”

Meanwhile, around the North Pole, the same thing seems to be happening. Tony Heller of Steven Goddard reports that “Ice growth in Greenland continues at record levels this fall. The surface of Greenland has gained 200 billion tons of snow and ice in the last eight weeks. This has been accompanied by record cold weather approaching -60C” and also that “Arctic sea ice extent is at a ten year high for the date, after record growth“.
Maybe the NWO controllers should have made anthropogenic global cooling their crusade, and fooled people into some other kind of tax based on plummeting temperatures … oh, wait a minute, they did (see image above)! I guess it’s too late to reverse course now … although with the vague term climate change anything is possible.

Read more

Population Controllers Call Babies “Carbon Legacies,” a Threat to the Environment

Life News

I guess it takes global warming hysteria to get the bioethics movement to criticize what is known in the trade as “artificial reproductive technologies” or ART.

But now, in the ever more radical Journal of Medical Ethics, Cristina Richie, of Boston College’s Department of Theology, argues that these technologies should be regulated to limit the number of children–called “carbon legacies,” as a means of fighting climate change. From the article:

A carbon footprint is the aggregate of resource use and carbon emissions over a person’s life. A carbon legacy occurs when a person chooses to procreate. All people have carbon footprints; only people with biological children have carbon legacies.

I don’t know if Richie coined the term, but it is ridiculous. Children are children, not bundles of carbon producers.

ART is an almost unregulated industry, a lamentable circumstance with which many bioethicists are content. But Richie says global warming has to change the field’s thinking about ART.

Through the use of ARTs multiple children are born, adding to worldwide carbon emissions. This is a burden on the already over-taxed ecosystem to support new beings who might not have existed without medical intervention. It is therefore the obligation of environmental policymakers, the ethical and medical communities, and even society to carefully weigh the interests of our shared planet with a business that intentionally creates more humans when we must reduce our carbon impact.

All those IVF babies are melting the ice caps!

While population growth and ARTs are not the primary environmental issue that should concern ecologists and bioethicists, the numbers of ART babies are increasing at an exponential rate. If we were to look at these numbers in terms of carbon emissions instead of raw population growth data, the statistics look grim.

No, grim is the exploitation of surrogates in biological colonialism and the eugenic impetus that has sunk its fangs deep into the heart of the industry. In the face of such human objectification, sorry, I can’t get upset about global warming.
It’s time to regulate!

The unregulated ART business can no longer be endorsed and the medical industry ought not operate in an environmental vacuum. Retrenchment in all areas of life is the key to slowing down or halting carbon emissions that lead to climate change. For each child made through medical intervention a carbon legacy results. ARTs should be allocated with due concern for the environment and sober consideration for the implications of climate change.

Carbon caps on the fertility business and eliminating funded ARTs for those who are not biologically infertile are the beginning of an environmentally sustainable ART business.​

“And Jesus said, ‘Suffer the little carbon legacies to come onto me’…” Good grief.

LifeNews.com Note: Wesley J. Smith, J.D., is a special consultant to the Center for Bioethics and Culture and a bioethics attorney who blogs at Human Exeptionalism.